• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对多重遗传易感性测试结果的理解和反应。

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):681-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.22.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2012.22
PMID:22481132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3417078/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Examination of patients' responses to direct-to-consumer genetic susceptibility tests is needed to inform clinical practice. This study examined patients' recall and interpretation of, and responses to, genetic susceptibility test results provided directly by mail.

METHODS

This observational study had three prospective assessments (before testing, 10 days after receiving results, and 3 months later). Participants were 199 patients aged 25-40 years who received free genetic susceptibility testing for eight common health conditions.

RESULTS

More than 80% of the patients correctly recalled their results for the eight health conditions. Patients were unlikely to interpret genetic results as deterministic of health outcomes (mean = 6.0, s.d. = 0.8 on a scale of 1-7, 1 indicating strongly deterministic). In multivariate analysis, patients with the least deterministic interpretations were white (P = 0.0098), more educated (P = 0.0093), and least confused by results (P = 0.001). Only 1% talked about their results with a provider.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that most patients will correctly recall their results and will not interpret genetics as the sole cause of diseases. The subset of those confused by results could benefit from consultation with a health-care provider, which could emphasize that health habits currently are the best predictors of risk. Providers could leverage patients' interest in genetic tests to encourage behavior changes to reduce disease risk.

摘要

目的

需要对患者对直接面向消费者的遗传易感性测试的反应进行检查,以为临床实践提供信息。本研究考察了患者对邮寄直接提供的遗传易感性测试结果的回忆、解释和反应。

方法

本观察性研究有三个前瞻性评估(测试前、收到结果后 10 天和 3 个月后)。参与者为 199 名年龄在 25-40 岁之间的患者,他们免费接受了八项常见健康状况的遗传易感性测试。

结果

超过 80%的患者正确回忆了他们在八项健康状况方面的测试结果。患者不太可能将遗传结果解释为健康结果的决定因素(在 1-7 的量表上,平均值为 6.0,标准差为 0.8,1 表示强烈决定论)。在多变量分析中,对结果最不具有决定论解释的患者是白人(P = 0.0098)、受教育程度更高(P = 0.0093)、对结果最不困惑(P = 0.001)。只有 1%的患者与提供者讨论了他们的结果。

结论

研究结果表明,大多数患者将正确回忆他们的结果,并且不会将遗传学视为疾病的唯一原因。对结果感到困惑的患者可以从与医疗保健提供者的咨询中受益,这可以强调健康习惯是风险的最佳预测因素。提供者可以利用患者对遗传测试的兴趣,鼓励他们改变行为以降低疾病风险。

相似文献

1
Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.患者对多重遗传易感性测试结果的理解和反应。
Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):681-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.22.
2
Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.比较阿尔茨海默病易感性基因检测与确定性基因检测的特定检测困扰。
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Nov;4(6):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.04.007.
3
Patient perspectives on variant reclassification after cancer susceptibility testing.患者对癌症易感性检测后变异重新分类的看法。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):e1275. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1275. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
5
Developing the MyCancerGene Digital Health Portal to Improve Patients' Understanding of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results: Development, User, and Usability Testing Study.开发MyCancerGene数字健康门户网站以提高患者对遗传性癌症基因检测结果的理解:开发、用户及可用性测试研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 14;9:e56282. doi: 10.2196/56282.
6
[Attitudes towards predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease].[对阿尔茨海默病预测性基因检测的态度]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Jun;39(3):233-9. doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0377-3.
7
Interest in genetic counseling and testing for adolescent nicotine addiction susceptibility among a sample of adolescent medicine providers attending a scientific conference on adolescent health.在参加青少年健康科学会议的青少年医学提供者样本中,对青少年尼古丁成瘾易感性的遗传咨询和检测的兴趣。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jul;41(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.017.
8
Differences in BRCA counseling and testing practices based on ordering provider type.基于开单医生类型的BRCA咨询与检测实践差异。
Genet Med. 2015 Jan;17(1):51-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.75. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Development of a tiered and binned genetic counseling model for informed consent in the era of multiplex testing for cancer susceptibility.癌症易感性多重检测时代用于知情同意的分层和分箱遗传咨询模型的开发。
Genet Med. 2015 Jun;17(6):485-92. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.134. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.患者和医疗服务提供者对前列腺癌易感性基因检测的态度:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 20;13:279. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-279.

引用本文的文献

1
Public knowledge and acceptance of genetic testing for disability-related diseases in pharmacies: A cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究:药房中公众对残疾相关疾病基因检测的认知与接受情况
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43866. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043866.
2
Assessing the Impact of Simplified Language on a Patient-Facing Pharmacogenetic Report: A User Comprehension Study.评估简化语言对面向患者的药物遗传学报告的影响:一项用户理解研究。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):247. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060247.
3
Clinical Practice, Challenges, and the Future of Ophthalmic Genetics in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯眼科遗传学的临床实践、挑战与未来
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2025 Apr 2;20:1-8. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v20.15890. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
How people undergoing genomic sequencing interpret and react to varied secondary findings with limited actionability.进行基因组测序的人如何解读并应对具有有限可操作性的各种次要发现。
Per Med. 2025 Apr;22(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2476392. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
5
The Risk Information and Skin-cancer Education for Undergraduate Prevention (RISE-UP) Study: Protocol for a Trial of Personalized Sun Protection Interventions for Skin Cancer Prevention among Undergraduate Students.大学生皮肤癌预防风险信息与教育(RISE-UP)研究:一项针对大学生预防皮肤癌的个性化防晒干预试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;147:107728. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107728. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
6
Research Participants' Perspectives on Precision Diagnostics for Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病精准诊断研究参与者的观点。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(3):1261-1274. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230609.
7
Predictors of correct recall of genetic risk information among Hispanic individuals in Florida and Puerto Rico.佛罗里达州和波多黎各西班牙裔个体正确回忆遗传风险信息的预测因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Dec;117:107978. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107978. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
8
Uptake of Genetic Research Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Return of Results Incorporating Web-Based Predisclosure Education.纳入基于网络的结果披露前教育的遗传研究结果和患者报告结局的接受情况与结果回报。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;41(31):4905-4915. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00516. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)以及设计一项随机对照试验以测试美国黑人女性癌症遗传研究结果在线返还的挑战。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Implementation of a culturally competent genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design.将文化能力纳入活体供者评估的基因检测项目的实施:一项两站点、非随机、前后试验设计。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e067657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067657.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of direct-to-consumer predictive genomic testing on risk perception and worry among patients receiving routine care in a preventive health clinic.直接面向消费者的预测性基因检测对预防保健诊所常规护理患者的风险感知和担忧的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Oct;86(10):933-40. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0190.
2
The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测结果的理解与认知。
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1159/000327159. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.直接面向消费者的全基因组分析评估疾病风险的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):524-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011893. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
4
Awareness and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among U.S. primary care physicians.美国初级保健医生对 BRCA1/2 检测的认知和使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.027.
5
Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.个人基因组学与个体身份:早期用户的动机与道德要求
New Genet Soc. 2010 Sep 1;29(3):261-290. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2010.507485.
6
Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.消费者对基于网络信息的使用及其关于多重基因易感性检测的决策。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Sep 29;12(3):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1587.
7
Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age.为消费者驱动的基因组时代做准备。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1099-103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006202. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
8
Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.消费者对直接面向消费者的基因信息的看法。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:427-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141604.
9
Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.传递遗传和基因组信息:健康素养与数字能力考量
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(4-5):279-89. doi: 10.1159/000294191. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
10
Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.向消费者直接提供与健康相关的基因检测服务的网站的信息内容、文化程度要求和可用性。
Genet Med. 2010 May;12(5):304-12. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181dbd8b2.