Bortolotto Tissiana, Prando Federico, Dietschi Didier, Krejci Ivo
Division of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, 19 Rue Barthelemy Menn, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland,
Odontology. 2014 Jul;102(2):184-8. doi: 10.1007/s10266-013-0123-4. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation and shrinkage stress development of a micro hybrid restorative composite as a function of energy density. Linear displacement and shrinkage forces were measured with custom-made devices for energies of 4,000, 8,000, 16,000 and 32,000 mJ/cm(2) at a constant power density of 800 mW/cm(2). Marginal adaptation of composite restorations cured with the same energy density was evaluated before and after mechanical loading with 300,000 cycles at 70 N. The group "4,000 mJ/cm(2)" showed the lowest shrinkage force [2.9(0.2) kg] and linear displacement [23.5(0.7) μm] but led to the worst marginal adaptation after loading [46.4(23.5) %CM] probably due to under-curing. When the maximum energy of 32,000 mJ/cm(2) was applied, a slight increase in shrinkage forces [3.6(0.2) kg and 29.2(0.8) μm], and a slight decrease in marginal adaptation after loading [75.4(11.5) %CM] were observed, but these changes were not significantly different in comparison to groups cured with energies of 8,000 and 16,000 mJ/cm(2). For the resin composite tested in this study, no differences in marginal adaptation could be detected above the energy threshold of 8,000 mJ/cm(2).
本研究的目的是评估一种微混合修复性复合材料的边缘适应性和收缩应力发展与能量密度的关系。使用定制设备在800 mW/cm²的恒定功率密度下,测量4000、8000、16000和32000 mJ/cm²能量下的线性位移和收缩力。在70 N下进行300,000次循环的机械加载前后,评估用相同能量密度固化的复合修复体的边缘适应性。“4000 mJ/cm²”组显示出最低的收缩力[2.9(0.2) kg]和线性位移[23.5(0.7) μm],但加载后边缘适应性最差[46.4(23.5)%CM],这可能是由于固化不足。当施加32000 mJ/cm²的最大能量时,观察到收缩力略有增加[3.6(0.2) kg和29.2(0.8) μm],加载后边缘适应性略有下降[75.4(11.5)%CM],但与用8000和16000 mJ/cm²能量固化的组相比,这些变化没有显著差异。对于本研究中测试的树脂复合材料,在8000 mJ/cm²的能量阈值以上,未检测到边缘适应性的差异。