Walton Merrilyn, Jeffery Heather, Van Staalduinen Samantha, Klein Linda, Rothnie Imogene
Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Teach. 2013 Aug;10(4):224-9. doi: 10.1111/tct.12029.
Medical education curricula are required to teach ethics, professionalism and patient safety, but there is no clear evidence as to when these topics should be introduced. The Personal and Professional Development (PPD) theme incorporates these topics, and is integrated throughout our postgraduate medical programme, but we were particularly interested in knowing when and how to introduce them to year-1 students. We describe an intensive PPD programme in the context of broader issues associated with the appropriate timing of PPD curricula in a medical programme.
The PPD Intensive was held over 2 days (267 students in 2008 and 299 in 2009). Attendance was mandatory. Teaching included a mixture of didactic, small group and interactive sessions. Students completed a formative case-based assessment and evaluation questionnaire.
In response to questions about a patient narrative, many students focused on the health provider perspective, even when asked specifically to put themselves in the patient's position when answering questions about the case. Students showed a superficial understanding of patient safety factors, even those who were previous health professionals. The Intensive was evaluated highly, but from the perspective of faculty staff there were issues relating to timing and lack of clinical context to give real meaning and purpose to the basic concepts underpinning the learning areas.
The Intensive was designed to demonstrate to students the importance of PPD. A counter position is that students lack the clinical context required for effective learning of PPD topic areas. We discuss these conflicting beliefs and the changes made to the Intensive programme in 2010. As a result of the lessons, we changed the 2010 Intensive programme to strongly emphasise professionalism; patient safety was moved to the later years.
医学教育课程要求教授伦理学、职业素养和患者安全,但对于这些主题应在何时引入,尚无明确证据。个人与职业发展(PPD)主题涵盖了这些内容,并贯穿于我们的研究生医学课程中,但我们特别想知道何时以及如何向一年级学生介绍这些内容。我们在医学课程中与PPD课程适当时间安排相关的更广泛问题背景下,描述了一个强化PPD项目。
PPD强化课程为期2天(2008年有267名学生,2009年有299名学生)。出勤是强制性的。教学包括讲授、小组讨论和互动环节。学生完成了基于案例的形成性评估和评价问卷。
在回答关于患者叙述的问题时,许多学生关注的是医疗服务提供者的角度,即使在被特别要求在回答有关该病例的问题时设身处地从患者角度思考。学生们对患者安全因素的理解较为肤浅,即使是那些以前是医疗专业人员的学生也是如此。该强化课程得到了高度评价,但从教师的角度来看,存在时间安排以及缺乏临床背景以赋予学习领域基础概念真正意义和目的的问题。
该强化课程旨在向学生展示PPD的重要性。一种相反的观点是,学生缺乏有效学习PPD主题领域所需的临床背景。我们讨论了这些相互冲突的观点以及2010年对强化课程所做的改变。吸取教训后,我们在2010年改变了强化课程,大力强调职业素养;患者安全则推迟到后面几年。