Suppr超能文献

低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)在患者安全课程实施方面处于什么阶段,实施的障碍有哪些?一项两阶段横断面研究。

What stage are low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) at with patient safety curriculum implementation and what are the barriers to implementation? A two-stage cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Ginsburg Liane R, Dhingra-Kumar Neelam, Donaldson Liam J

机构信息

Health Policy & Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Service Delivery and Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e016110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016110.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The improvement of safety in healthcare worldwide depends in part on the knowledge, skills and attitudes of staff providing care. Greater patient safety content in health professional education and training programmes has been advocated internationally. While WHO Patient Safety Curriculum Guides (for Medical Schools and Multi-Professional Curricula) have been widely disseminated in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) over the last several years, little is known about patient safety curriculum implementation beyond high-income countries. The present study examines patient safety curriculum implementation in LMICs.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional surveys were carried out. First, 88 technical officers in Ministries of Health and WHO country offices were surveyed to identify the pattern of patient safety curricula at country level. A second survey followed that gathered information from 71 people in a position to provide institution-level perspectives on patient safety curriculum implementation.

RESULTS

The majority, 69% (30/44), of the countries were either considering whether to implement a patient safety curriculum or actively planning, rather than actually implementing, or embedding one. Most organisations recognised the need for patient safety education and training and felt a safety curriculum was compatible with the values of their organisation; however, important faculty-level barriers to patient safety curriculum implementation were identified. Key structural markers, such as dedicated financial resources and relevant assessment tools to evaluate trainees' patient safety knowledge and skills, were in place in fewer than half of organisations studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater attention to patient safety curriculum implementation is needed. The barriers to patient safety curriculum implementation we identified in LMICs are not unique to these regions. We propose a framework to act as a global standard for patient safety curriculum implementation. Educating leaders through the system in order to embed patient safety culture in education and clinical settings is a critical first step.

摘要

目标

全球医疗卫生领域安全性的提高部分取决于提供护理服务的工作人员的知识、技能和态度。国际上一直倡导在卫生专业教育和培训项目中增加患者安全相关内容。尽管世界卫生组织的《患者安全课程指南》(针对医学院校和多专业课程)在过去几年已在低收入和中等收入国家广泛传播,但对于高收入国家以外地区的患者安全课程实施情况却知之甚少。本研究考察了低收入和中等收入国家的患者安全课程实施情况。

方法

开展了两项横断面调查。首先,对卫生部和世界卫生组织国家办事处的88名技术官员进行了调查,以确定国家层面患者安全课程的模式。随后进行了第二项调查,收集了71名能够提供机构层面患者安全课程实施观点的人员的信息。

结果

大多数国家,即69%(30/44),要么在考虑是否实施患者安全课程,要么在积极规划,而非实际实施或融入该课程。大多数组织认识到患者安全教育和培训的必要性,并认为安全课程与组织价值观相符;然而,也发现了患者安全课程实施过程中在教师层面存在的重要障碍。在所研究的组织中,不到一半具备关键的结构性标志,如专门的财政资源以及用于评估学员患者安全知识和技能的相关评估工具。

结论

需要更加关注患者安全课程的实施。我们在低收入和中等收入国家发现的患者安全课程实施障碍并非这些地区所独有。我们提出了一个框架,作为患者安全课程实施的全球标准。通过该系统对领导者进行教育,以便在教育和临床环境中融入患者安全文化,是关键的第一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验