Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1151-5. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9623-6.
There has been increasing interest in adjusting CT radiation dose data for patient body size. A method for automated computation of the abdominal effective diameter of a patient from a CT image has previously only been tested in adult patients. In this work, we tested the method on a set of 128 pediatric patients aged 0.8 to 12.9 years (average 8.0 years, SD = 3.7 years) who had CT abdomen/pelvis exams performed on a Toshiba Aquilion 64 scanner. For this set of patients, age-predicted abdominal effective diameter extrapolated based on data from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements was a relatively poor predictor of measured effective diameter. The mean absolute percentage error between the CTDI normalization coefficient calculated from a manually measured effective diameter and the coefficient determined by age-predicted effective diameter was 12.3 % with respect to a 32 cm phantom (range 0.0-52.8 %, SD 8.7 %) and 12.9 % with respect to a 16 cm phantom (range 0.0-56.4 %, SD 9.2 %). In contrast, there is a close correspondence between the automated and manually measured patient effective diameters, with a mean absolute error of 0.6 cm (error range 0.2-1.3 cm). This correspondence translates into a high degree of correspondence between normalization coefficients determined by automated and manual measurements; the mean absolute percentage error was 2.1 % with respect to a 32 cm phantom (range 0.0-8.1 %, SD = 1.4 %) and 2.3 % with respect to a 16 cm phantom (range 0.0-9.3 %, SD = 1.6 %).
人们对调整 CT 辐射剂量数据以适应患者体型越来越感兴趣。一种从 CT 图像自动计算患者腹部有效直径的方法此前仅在成年患者中进行过测试。在这项工作中,我们在一组 128 名年龄在 0.8 至 12.9 岁(平均 8.0 岁,标准差=3.7 岁)的儿科患者身上测试了该方法,这些患者在东芝 Aquilion 64 扫描仪上进行了腹部/骨盆 CT 检查。对于这组患者,基于国际辐射单位和测量委员会(International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements)数据预测的年龄相关腹部有效直径是测量有效直径的相对较差的预测指标。根据手动测量的有效直径计算的 CTDI 归一化系数与根据年龄预测的有效直径确定的系数之间的平均绝对百分比误差为 32cm 体模时为 12.3%(范围为 0.0-52.8%,标准差为 8.7%),16cm 体模时为 12.9%(范围为 0.0-56.4%,标准差为 9.2%)。相比之下,自动和手动测量的患者有效直径之间存在密切对应关系,平均绝对误差为 0.6cm(误差范围为 0.2-1.3cm)。这种对应关系转化为自动和手动测量确定的归一化系数之间具有高度的一致性;32cm 体模时的平均绝对百分比误差为 2.1%(范围为 0.0-8.1%,标准差=1.4%),16cm 体模时为 2.3%(范围为 0.0-9.3%,标准差=1.6%)。