• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过“2.0 版”的问责制医疗来改革医疗保险。

Reforming Medicare through 'version 2.0' of accountable care.

机构信息

Lieberman Consulting, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1258-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0337.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0337
PMID:23836742
Abstract

Medicare needs fundamental reform to achieve fiscal sustainability, improve value and quality, and preserve beneficiaries' access to physicians. Physician fees will fall by one-quarter in 2014 under current law, and the dire federal budget outlook virtually precludes increasing Medicare spending. There is a growing consensus among policy makers that reforming fee-for-service payment, which has long served as the backbone of Medicare, is unavoidable. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) provide a new payment alternative but currently have limited tools to control cost growth or engage and reward beneficiaries and providers. To fundamentally reform Medicare, this article proposes an enhanced version of ACOs that would eliminate the scheduled physician fee cuts, allow fees to increase with inflation, and enhance ACOs' ability to manage care. In exchange, the proposal would require modest reductions in overall Medicare spending and require ACOs to accept increased accountability and financial risk. It would cause per beneficiary Medicare spending by 2023 to fall 4.2 percent below current Congressional Budget Office projections and help the program achieve fiscal sustainability.

摘要

医疗保险需要进行根本性改革,以实现财政可持续性、提高价值和质量,并维护受益人的医生就诊渠道。根据现行法律,2014 年医生的费用将下降四分之一,而严峻的联邦预算前景几乎排除了增加医疗保险支出的可能性。政策制定者越来越达成共识,认为改革长期以来一直是医疗保险支柱的按服务收费支付方式是不可避免的。责任医疗组织(ACO)提供了一种新的支付选择,但目前控制成本增长或吸引和奖励受益人和提供者的工具有限。为了从根本上改革医疗保险,本文提出了一个改进版的 ACO,该版本将取消预定的医生费用削减,允许费用随通胀而增加,并增强 ACO 管理护理的能力。作为交换,该提案将要求适度减少医疗保险的总体支出,并要求 ACO 承担更多的责任和财务风险。到 2023 年,它将导致每位受益人的医疗保险支出比国会预算办公室的预测低 4.2%,并帮助该计划实现财政可持续性。

相似文献

1
Reforming Medicare through 'version 2.0' of accountable care.通过“2.0 版”的问责制医疗来改革医疗保险。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1258-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0337.
2
Achieving health care cost containment through provider payment reform that engages patients and providers.通过让患者和提供者参与的提供者支付方式改革来实现医疗保健成本控制。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):929-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1007.
3
Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.先驱责任医疗组织与传统 Medicare 按服务收费制在支出、利用和患者体验方面的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2152-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4930.
4
Accountable care organizations and the allergist: challenges and opportunities.责任医疗组织与过敏科医生:挑战与机遇。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.09.020.
5
Regulatory neutrality is essential to establishing a level playing field for accountable care organizations.监管中立对于建立问责制医疗照护组织的公平竞争环境至关重要。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1426-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0360.
6
Avoiding unintended incentives in ACO payment models.避免负责医疗组织(ACO)支付模式中的非预期激励措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):143-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0444.
7
Association Between Medicare Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Spending Among Clinically Vulnerable Beneficiaries.医疗保险责任制医疗组织实施与临床脆弱受益人群支出的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1167-75. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2827.
8
Outpatient care patterns and organizational accountability in Medicare.医疗保险中的门诊护理模式和组织问责制。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):938-45. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1073.
9
The Economics of Provider Payment Reform: Are Accountable Care Organizations the Answer?医疗服务提供者支付改革的经济学: accountable care organizations 是答案吗? (注:Accountable Care Organizations 一般译为“ accountable care organizations”,可简称为“ accountable care organizations”,直译为“ accountable care organizations”,意译为“ accountable care organizations”,具体可根据上下文调整,这里暂保留英文未翻译)
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Aug;40(4):745-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3150038. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Issues in health care: interventional pain management at the crossroads.医疗保健中的问题:介入性疼痛管理处于十字路口。
Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):261-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of State Access Standards With Accessibility to Specialists for Medicaid Managed Care Enrollees.州准入标准与医疗补助管理式医疗参保者获得专科医生服务的可及性之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct 1;177(10):1445-1451. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3766.
2
Quality and innovations for caring hospitalized older persons in the unites States.关爱美国住院老年患者的质量与创新。
Aging Dis. 2013 Oct 20;5(1):41-51. doi: 10.14366/AD.2014.050041. eCollection 2014 Feb.