• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.在精神病医院实施促进患者参与的发展计划会改变患者的体验吗?一项非随机对照研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):809-25. doi: 10.1111/hex.12105. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
2
Effect of an institutional development plan for user participation on professionals' knowledge, practice, and attitudes. A controlled study.参与式用户发展计划对专业人员知识、实践和态度的影响。一项对照研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 2;11:296. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-296.
3
Long Term Effect on Professionals' Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes towards User Involvement Four Years after Implementing an Organisational Development Plan: A Controlled Study.实施组织发展计划四年后对专业人员关于用户参与的知识、实践和态度的长期影响:一项对照研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0150742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150742. eCollection 2016.
4
Experiences from the implementation of a comprehensive development plan for user involvement in a mental health hospital: A qualitative case study.在精神卫生医院实施全面的患者参与发展计划的经验:一个定性案例研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;60(4):387-95. doi: 10.1177/0020764013491739. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
User participation when using milieu therapy in a psychiatric hospital in Norway: a mission impossible?挪威一家精神病院使用环境治疗时的患者参与:不可能完成的任务?
Nurs Inq. 2009 Dec;16(4):287-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00463.x.
6
[User involvement in hospital departments?].患者参与医院科室事务?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Sep 11;128(17):1944-5.
7
Dependence and resistance in community mental health care-Negotiations of user participation between staff and users.社区精神卫生保健中的依赖与抗拒——工作人员与服务对象之间关于服务对象参与的协商
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):600-609. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12407. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Service user involvement in a secure setting before and after the implementation of recovery-oriented practice: A quasi-experimental study.在实施以康复为导向的实践前后,在安全环境中让服务使用者参与:一项准实验研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4055-4068. doi: 10.1111/jan.14841. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Working alliance among mental health nurses in Indonesia: A comparative analysis of socio-demographic characteristics.印度尼西亚精神科护士的工作联盟:社会人口学特征的比较分析
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Apr 29;7(2):125-130. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1259. eCollection 2021.
2
Conceptualizing patient participation in psychiatry: A survey describing the voice of patients in outpatient care.概念化精神病学中的患者参与:一项描述门诊护理中患者声音的调查。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1443-1449. doi: 10.1111/hex.13285. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Building patient capacity to participate in care during hospitalisation: a scoping review.建立患者在住院期间参与护理的能力:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 3;9(7):e026551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026551.
4
Long Term Effect on Professionals' Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes towards User Involvement Four Years after Implementing an Organisational Development Plan: A Controlled Study.实施组织发展计划四年后对专业人员关于用户参与的知识、实践和态度的长期影响:一项对照研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0150742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150742. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all.患者参与精神卫生保健:一刀切并不合适。
Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):138-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00743.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
2
Effect of an institutional development plan for user participation on professionals' knowledge, practice, and attitudes. A controlled study.参与式用户发展计划对专业人员知识、实践和态度的影响。一项对照研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 2;11:296. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-296.
3
Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.消费者参与和医疗保健中的组织发展:系统评价。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011 Jul;123(13-14):408-14. doi: 10.1007/s00508-011-0008-x. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
4
User involvement in hospital wards: professionals negotiating user knowledge. A qualitative study.患者参与医院病房事务:专业人员协商患者知识。一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):e144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
5
Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.测量患者对以患者为中心的医疗服务的感知:家庭医学工具的系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64. doi: 10.1370/afm.1226.
6
User involvement in in-patient mental health services: operationalisation, empirical testing, and validation.患者参与住院精神卫生服务:操作化、实证检验和验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jul;19(13-14):1897-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03036.x.
7
Implementation of a panel of service users for the evaluation of mental health outpatient services.服务使用者小组对精神科门诊服务的评估实施。
Eval Health Prof. 2010 Dec;33(4):480-96. doi: 10.1177/0163278710383561. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
8
A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education.欧洲和北美的卫生专业人员对患者进行健康教育的历史:从权威到共同决策教育。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
9
Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety.患者参与:当前的知识和在患者安全中的适用性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jan;85(1):53-62. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
10
The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts.以患者为中心与患者赋权之间的关系:概念探讨。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

在精神病医院实施促进患者参与的发展计划会改变患者的体验吗?一项非随机对照研究。

Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Rise Marit B, Steinsbekk Aslak

机构信息

Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):809-25. doi: 10.1111/hex.12105. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12105
PMID:23837534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Governments in several countries attempt to strengthen user participation through instructing health-care organizations to implement user participation initiatives. There is, however, little knowledge on the effect on patients' experience from comprehensive plans for enhancing user participation in whole health service organizations.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether implementing a development plan intending to enhance user participation in a mental hospital had any effect on the patients' experience of user participation.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A non-randomized controlled study including patients in three mental hospitals in Central Norway, one intervention hospital and two control hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

A development plan intended to enhance user participation was implemented in the intervention hospital as a part of a larger reorganizational process. The plan included establishment of a patient education centre and a user office, purchase of user expertise, appointment of contact professionals for next of kin and improvement of the centre's information and the professional culture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perceptions of Care, Inpatient Treatment Alliance Scale and questions made for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 1651 patients participated. Implementing a development plan in a mental hospital intending to enhance user participation had no significant effect on the patients' experience of user participation.

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

The lack of effect can be due to inappropriate initiatives or challenges in implementation processes. Further research should ensure that initiatives and implementation processes are appropriate to impact the patients' experience.

摘要

背景

几个国家的政府试图通过指示医疗保健组织实施用户参与倡议来加强用户参与。然而,对于全面计划在整个医疗服务组织中增强用户参与对患者体验的影响,了解甚少。

目的

调查在一家精神病医院实施旨在增强用户参与的发展计划是否对患者的用户参与体验有任何影响。

设计、地点和参与者:一项非随机对照研究,包括挪威中部三家精神病医院的患者,一家干预医院和两家对照医院。

干预措施

作为更大规模重组过程的一部分,在干预医院实施了一项旨在增强用户参与的发展计划。该计划包括建立患者教育中心和用户办公室、购买用户专业知识、为近亲指定联络专业人员以及改善中心的信息和专业文化。

主要结局指标

护理感知、住院治疗联盟量表以及为本研究提出的问题。

结果

共有1651名患者参与。在精神病医院实施旨在增强用户参与的发展计划对患者的用户参与体验没有显著影响。

讨论与结论

缺乏效果可能是由于举措不当或实施过程中存在挑战。进一步的研究应确保举措和实施过程适合影响患者体验。