Suppr超能文献

骨干锁骨骨折治疗决策:外科医生之间是否存在共识?一项关于外科医生治疗偏好的调查结果。

Decision-making in the treatment of diaphyseal clavicle fractures: is there agreement among surgeons? Results of a survey on surgeons' treatment preferences.

机构信息

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.

Cascade Orthopedics & Sports Medicine Center P.C., The Dalles, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):e23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Nonoperative treatment is standard for most diaphyseal clavicle fractures, but recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with operative treatment of displaced fractures. The objectives of this diagnostic study were to assess agreement of orthopaedic surgeons regarding their treatment preferences for diaphyseal clavicle fractures and to compare them with recent recommendations. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement in treatment decisions were hypothesized to be only slight.

METHODS

Anonymized case vignettes of 50 acute diaphyseal clavicle fractures including medical history, physical examination findings, and radiographs were independently reviewed by 32 orthopaedic surgeons from the United States. Four treatment options were offered and decisions were compared with current treatment recommendations. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Average intraobserver agreement for surgeons who completed a retest review (minimum interval of 8 weeks) was calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two surgeons completed the first round of reviewing and 27 completed the retest (mean interval, 22 weeks). Interobserver agreement was overall fair (kappa = 0.36) and moderate (kappa = 0.56) when operative options were compared with nonoperative options. Median intraobserver agreement was 74% for the 4 treatment options offered and 84% in deciding on operative vs. nonoperative means. Concordance with recent recommendations for operative vs. nonoperative treatment was seen in 91% of decisions (median).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Recent recommendations appear to have been adopted by a selected subgroup of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, showing a surprisingly high median concordance of 91% in this study. However, only fair to moderate interobserver and intraobserver agreement was present, leaving potential for improvement.

摘要

背景与假设

非手术治疗是大多数锁骨骨干骨折的标准治疗方法,但最近的研究表明,手术治疗移位骨折的效果更好。本诊断研究的目的是评估骨科医生对锁骨骨干骨折治疗偏好的一致性,并将其与最近的建议进行比较。假设治疗决策的观察者间和观察者内一致性仅为轻微。

方法

对 50 例急性锁骨骨干骨折的匿名病例进行描述,包括病史、体格检查结果和 X 线片,由来自美国的 32 名骨科医生进行独立评估。提供了 4 种治疗选择,并将决策与当前的治疗建议进行比较。使用 Fleiss' kappa 系数计算观察者间一致性。对完成重测评估(最小间隔 8 周)的外科医生进行平均观察者内一致性计算。

结果

32 名外科医生完成了第一轮评估,27 名外科医生完成了重测(平均间隔 22 周)。当比较手术与非手术选择时,观察者间一致性总体为中等(kappa = 0.56)。对于提供的 4 种治疗选择,中位数观察者内一致性为 74%,而在决定手术与非手术方法时为 84%。在 91%的决策中,手术与非手术治疗的建议一致(中位数)。

讨论与结论

最近的建议似乎已被美国骨科医生中的一个选定亚组采用,在这项研究中,中位数高达 91%的一致性令人惊讶。然而,观察者间和观察者内一致性仅为中等至轻微,仍有改进的空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验