Lenza Mario, Taniguchi Luiz Fabiano Presente, Ferretti Mario
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenida Albert Einstein, 627/701 - Jardim Leonor, CEP: 05652-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital Municipal Dr. Moyses Deutsch, Estrada do M'boi Mirim, 5203 - Jardim Angela, CEP: 04948-030, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Trials. 2016 May 4;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1355-8.
Fracture of the clavicle is common, accounting for 2.6 to 4.0 % of all fractures, with an overall incidence of 36.5 to 64 per 100,000 per year. Around 80 % of clavicle fractures occur in the middle third of the clavicle. Randomised controlled trials comparing treatment interventions have failed to indicate the best therapeutic practices for these fractures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects (benefits and harms) of two commonly-used conservative interventions: the figure-of-eight bandage versus the arm sling as treatments of middle-third clavicle fractures.
METHODS/DESIGN: This project has been designed as a single-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial that will compare two interventions: figure-of-eight bandage versus the arm sling. We propose to recruit 110 adults, aged 18 years or older, with an acute (less than 10 days since injury) middle-third clavicle fracture. The primary outcomes to be evaluated will be function and/or disability measured by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. In order to assess the secondary outcomes, the Modified University of California at Los Angeles (modified - UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale will be used. The occurrence of pain (Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS)), treatment failure, adverse events and the ability to return to previous activities will also be recorded and evaluated as secondary outcomes.
the primary outcome DASH score and the secondary outcomes - modified UCLA and VAS scores - will be analysed graphically. We will apply generalised mixed models with the intervention groups (two levels), and time-point assessments (seven levels) as fixed effects and patients as a random effect.
According to the current literature there is very limited evidence from two small trials regarding the effectiveness of different methods of conservative interventions for treating clavicle fractures. This is the first randomised controlled trial comparing the figure-of-eight bandage versus the arm sling for treating clavicle fractures that follows the CONSORT Statement guidelines.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02398006 .
锁骨骨折很常见,占所有骨折的2.6%至4.0%,年总体发病率为每10万人中36.5至64例。约80%的锁骨骨折发生在锁骨中1/3段。比较治疗干预措施的随机对照试验未能表明这些骨折的最佳治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估两种常用保守干预措施的效果(益处和危害):“8”字绷带与手臂吊带治疗锁骨中1/3段骨折。
方法/设计:本项目设计为单中心、双臂随机对照试验,将比较两种干预措施:“8”字绷带与手臂吊带。我们计划招募110名18岁及以上的成年人,他们患有急性(受伤后不到10天)锁骨中1/3段骨折。待评估的主要结局将是通过手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷测量的功能和/或残疾情况。为了评估次要结局,将使用改良的加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(改良-UCLA)肩部评分量表。疼痛的发生情况(视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS))、治疗失败、不良事件以及恢复先前活动的能力也将作为次要结局进行记录和评估。
主要结局DASH评分以及次要结局——改良UCLA和VAS评分——将以图表形式进行分析。我们将应用广义混合模型,将干预组(两个水平)和时间点评估(七个水平)作为固定效应,将患者作为随机效应。
根据当前文献,仅有两项小型试验提供了关于不同保守干预方法治疗锁骨骨折有效性的非常有限的证据。这是第一项遵循CONSORT声明指南比较“8”字绷带与手臂吊带治疗锁骨骨折的随机对照试验。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02398006 。