• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长在儿科临床试验招募中的意向与研究人员不同,且往往未被提及:一项定性研究。

Parents' agendas in paediatric clinical trial recruitment are different from researchers' and often remain unvoiced: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e67352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067352. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0067352
PMID:23844006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3701006/
Abstract

Ensuring parents make an informed decision about their child's participation in a clinical trial is a challenge for practitioners as a parent's comprehension of a trial may differ from that intended by the practitioners responsible for recruitment. We explored what issues parents consider important when making a decision about participation in a paediatric clinical trial and their comprehension of these issues to inform future recruitment practice. This qualitative interview and observational study examined recruitment in four placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised clinical trials of medicines for children. Audio-recorded trial recruitment discussions between practitioners and parents (N = 41) were matched with semi-structured interviews with parents (N = 41). When making a decision about trial entry parents considered clinical benefit, child safety, practicalities of participation, research for the common good, access to medication and randomisation. Within these prioritised issues parents had specific misunderstandings, which had the potential to influence their decisions. While parents had many questions and concerns about trial participation which influenced their decision-making, they rarely voiced these during discussions about the trials with practitioners. Those involved in the recruitment of children to clinical trials need to be aware of parents' priorities and the sorts of misunderstandings that can arise with parents. Providing trial information that is tailored to what parents consider important in making a decision about a clinical trial may improve recruitment practice and ultimately benefit evidence-based paediatric medicine.

摘要

确保家长能够对孩子参与临床试验做出明智的决定,这对从业者来说是一项挑战,因为家长对试验的理解可能与负责招募的从业者的理解不同。我们探讨了家长在决定参与儿科临床试验时考虑的重要问题,以及他们对这些问题的理解,以为未来的招募实践提供信息。这项定性访谈和观察性研究调查了四项针对儿童药物的安慰剂对照、双盲随机临床试验的招募情况。从业者与家长(N=41)之间的试验招募讨论进行了录音,并与家长(N=41)进行了半结构化访谈。当家长决定参与试验时,他们考虑了临床获益、儿童安全、参与的实际性、为共同利益进行的研究、药物的可及性和随机化。在这些优先考虑的问题中,家长有特定的误解,这些误解可能会影响他们的决策。尽管家长对参与试验有很多问题和担忧,这些问题影响了他们的决策过程,但他们很少在与从业者讨论试验时表达这些问题。那些参与招募儿童参与临床试验的人需要了解家长的优先事项以及家长可能产生的误解。提供符合家长在决定参与临床试验时认为重要的信息,可能会改善招募实践,并最终有益于基于证据的儿科医学。

相似文献

1
Parents' agendas in paediatric clinical trial recruitment are different from researchers' and often remain unvoiced: a qualitative study.家长在儿科临床试验招募中的意向与研究人员不同,且往往未被提及:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e67352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067352. Print 2013.
2
Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study.儿童药物随机对照试验招募过程(RECRUIT):一项定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(15):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta15150.
3
Understanding parents' decision-making on participation in clinical trials in children's heart surgery: a qualitative study.理解父母在儿童心脏手术临床试验中参与决策的情况:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e044896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044896.
4
Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the 'look and feel' of clinical trial discussions.在儿科肿瘤学中平衡高入组率和伦理招募:临床试验讨论的“外观和感觉”的定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Oct 22;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-101.
5
Surrendering control, or nothing to lose: Parents' preferences about participation in a randomised trial of childhood strabismus surgery.放弃控制权,或毫无损失:父母对参与儿童斜视手术随机试验的偏好
Clin Trials. 2015 Aug;12(4):384-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774515577956. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of parents' and physicians' experiences.儿科肿瘤临床护理与研究实践交叉点的伦理问题:对父母和医生经验的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Sep 27;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-18.
7
How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?当被要求让孩子参加一项随机对照试验时,家长会有怎样的体验?
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Feb 16;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-1.
8
Communication about children's clinical trials as observed and experienced: qualitative study of parents and practitioners.观察和体验到的儿童临床试验沟通:对父母和从业者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021604. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Parents' and children's experiences of participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial: AIDIT-QS.家长和儿童参与随机对照临床试验的体验:AIDIT-QS。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2408829. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2408829. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
10
'We knew it was a totally at random thing': parents' experiences of being part of a neonatal trial.“我们知道这完全是随机的事情”:父母参与新生儿试验的经历。
Trials. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2112-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of healthcare professionals' communication in trial participation decisions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment consultations and patient interviews across three RCTs.医疗保健专业人员的沟通在试验参与决策中的作用:对三项随机对照试验中的招募咨询和患者访谈进行的定性调查
Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08656-y.
2
Parental motivations and perceived barriers to participating in pediatric vaccine clinical trials: Findings from the OCV-S trial in Nepal.父母参与儿科疫苗临床试验的动机及感知到的障碍:尼泊尔OCV-S试验的结果
Vaccine X. 2024 Nov 22;21:100585. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100585. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Parents' and children's experiences of participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial: AIDIT-QS.家长和儿童参与随机对照临床试验的体验:AIDIT-QS。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2408829. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2408829. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
4
HAP-FAST: a feasibility study incorporating qualitative, mechanistic and costing sub-studies alongside a randomised pilot trial comparing chest x-ray to low-dose CT scan and empirical antibiotics to antibiotics guided by the BIOFIRE® FILM ARRAY® pneumonia panel in adults with suspected non-ventilator-associated hospital-cquired pneumonia.HAP-FAST:一项可行性研究,其中包括定性、机制和成本核算子研究,以及一项随机试点试验,比较了胸部 X 光检查与低剂量 CT 扫描,以及在疑似非呼吸机相关性医院获得性肺炎的成人中,根据 BIOFIRE® FILM ARRAY® 肺炎面板指导使用经验性抗生素与抗生素治疗的效果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e088490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088490.
5
The impact of parent treatment preference and other factors on recruitment: lessons learned from a paediatric epilepsy randomised controlled trial.父母治疗偏好及其他因素对招募的影响:一项儿科癫痫随机对照试验的经验教训。
Trials. 2023 Feb 6;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07091-9.
6
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.家长对参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.
7
Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.从利益相关者处学习,为重症监护病房的研究同意提供良好实践指导:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e066149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066149.
8
The Cure SMA Clinical Trial Experience Survey: A Study of Trial Participant Perspectives on Clinical Trial Management and Patient-Centric Management Practices.脊髓性肌萎缩症治疗临床试验经验调查:一项关于试验参与者对临床试验管理和以患者为中心管理实践观点的研究。
Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1167-1181. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00360-w. Epub 2022 May 30.
9
The lived experience of a novel disruptive therapy in a group of men and boys with haemophilia A with inhibitors: Emi & Me.《新型突破性疗法在一组血友病 A 伴抑制物男性和男孩中的应用体验:Emi & Me》
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):443-454. doi: 10.1111/hex.13404. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
What do parents think of using informational videos to support recruitment for parenting trials? A qualitative study.家长如何看待使用信息视频来支持育儿试验的招募?一项定性研究。
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05826-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision.支持积极的体验和持续参与临床试验:超越信息提供。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Dec;38(12):751-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100059. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
2
Standard 1: consent and recruitment.标准1:同意与招募。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129 Suppl 3:S118-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0055D.
3
Consent to tissue banking for research: qualitative study and recommendations.同意将组织用于研究的银行:定性研究和建议。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jul;97(7):632-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301165. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Patient-centered care: the influence of patient and resident physician gender and gender concordance in primary care.以患者为中心的医疗护理:初级保健中患者和住院医师的性别及性别一致性的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Mar;21(3):326-33. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2903. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
5
Conceptualizing the role of research literacy in advancing societal health.概念化研究素养在促进社会健康方面的作用。
J Health Psychol. 2012 Jul;17(5):724-30. doi: 10.1177/1359105311425273. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
6
Easy-to-read informed consent forms for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical trials.易于阅读的造血细胞移植临床试验知情同意书。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
7
The concept of voluntary consent.自愿同意的概念。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):6-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.
8
Communication about children's clinical trials as observed and experienced: qualitative study of parents and practitioners.观察和体验到的儿童临床试验沟通:对父母和从业者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021604. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.关键健康素养:综述与批判性分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 12.
10
Why do parents enroll their children in research: a narrative synthesis.为何家长让孩子参与研究:叙事综述。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):544-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040220. Epub 2011 Apr 8.