Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员的沟通在试验参与决策中的作用:对三项随机对照试验中的招募咨询和患者访谈进行的定性调查

The role of healthcare professionals' communication in trial participation decisions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment consultations and patient interviews across three RCTs.

作者信息

Farrar Nicola, Elliott Daisy, Jepson Marcus, Young Bridget, Donovan Jenny L, Conefrey Carmel, Realpe Alba X, Mills Nicola, Wade Julia, Lim Eric, Stein Robert C, Caskey Fergus J, Rooshenas Leila

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08656-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the challenges of recruiting to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are well documented, few studies have focused on the impact that the communication between recruiters and patients has on patients' participation decisions. Recruiters are thought to influence patient decision-making, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unclear. The aim of this research was to investigate how patients interpret and use the information conveyed to them by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in trial participation decisions.

METHODS

Three pragmatic UK-based multicentre RCTs were purposively sampled to provide contrasting clinical specialities. Data collection was integrated into each RCT, including audio-recordings of patient recruitment consultations and interviews with patients. Where possible, consultation audio-recordings were linked to interviews to explore how information communicated by recruiters was interpreted and used by patients during their decision-making. Data were analysed thematically, using the constant comparison approach.

RESULTS

Twenty audio-recorded recruitment consultations were obtained across the 3 RCTs, combined with 42 interviews with patients who had consented to or declined RCT participation. Consultation and interview data were 'linked' for 17 individual patients. Throughout the patient's clinical pathway, HCPs (both those involved in the RCT and not) influenced patients' perceptions of treatment need and benefit by indicating that they preferred a particular treatment option for the patient as an individual. Whilst patients valued and were influenced by information conveyed by HCPs, they also drew on support from other sources and ultimately framed RCT participation decisions as their own. Patients' willingness to be randomised hinged on perceptions of whether they stood to benefit from a particular treatment and the availability of those treatments outside of the trial.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the need for training and support for healthcare professionals involved throughout the clinical pathway of patients eligible for RCTs, as all healthcare professionals who interact with patients have the potential to influence their perceptions of treatments being compared in the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OPTIMA ISRCTN42400492. Prospectively registered on 26 June 2012. Prepare for Kidney Care ISRCTN17133653. Prospectively registered on 31 May 2017. MARS 2 ISRCTN44351742. Retrospectively registered on 5 September 2018.

摘要

背景

尽管招募患者参加随机对照试验(RCT)的挑战已有充分记录,但很少有研究关注招募人员与患者之间的沟通对患者参与决策的影响。人们认为招募人员会影响患者的决策,但这种影响发生的机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查患者在试验参与决策中如何解读和使用医疗保健专业人员(HCP)传达给他们的信息。

方法

有目的地抽取了三项基于英国的务实多中心RCT,以提供不同的临床专业领域。数据收集被整合到每项RCT中,包括患者招募咨询的音频记录以及对患者的访谈。在可能的情况下,将咨询音频记录与访谈相联系,以探讨招募人员传达的信息在患者决策过程中是如何被解读和使用的。采用持续比较法对数据进行主题分析。

结果

在这三项RCT中总共获得了20次音频记录的招募咨询,同时对42名同意或拒绝参加RCT的患者进行了访谈。为17名患者的咨询和访谈数据进行了“关联”。在患者的整个临床路径中,HCP(包括参与RCT的和未参与的)通过表明他们为患者个人选择了特定的治疗方案,影响了患者对治疗需求和益处的认知。虽然患者重视并受到HCP传达信息的影响,但他们也从其他来源获取支持,并最终将RCT参与决策视为自己的决定。患者参与随机分组的意愿取决于他们是否认为自己能从特定治疗中获益以及该治疗在试验之外是否可得。

结论

本研究支持有必要对参与符合RCT条件患者整个临床路径的医疗保健专业人员进行培训和提供支持,因为所有与患者互动的医疗保健专业人员都有可能影响患者对试验中所比较治疗的认知。

试验注册

OPTIMA,ISRCTN42400492。于2012年6月26日前瞻性注册。Prepare for Kidney Care,ISRCTN17133653。于2017年5月31日前瞻性注册。MARS 2,ISRCTN44351742。于2018年9月5日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9c/11653767/58871e74f846/13063_2024_8656_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验