Murray John M, Zaunders John J, Koelsch Kersten K, Natarajan Ven, Badralmaa Yunden, McBride Kristin, Carrera Alexander, Cooper David A, Emery Sean, Kelleher Anthony D
1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW, Australia .
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013 Dec;29(12):1621-5. doi: 10.1089/AID.2013.0132. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Viral blips, where HIV RNA plasma viral load (pVL) intermittently increases above the lower limit of assay detection, are a cause for concern. We investigated a number of hypotheses for their cause. We assessed HIV RNA, and total and episomal HIV DNA from 16 individuals commencing antiretroviral therapy (ART) consisting of raltegravir and tenofovir/emtricitabine for 3 years, using two assays: a single-copy assay [SCA; lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), <1 copy/ml] and the Amplicor assay (LLOQ of 50 copies/ml). Two individuals exhibited viral blips. From week 20 onward, the period where ART had achieved its final suppressive levels, pVL ranged from <1 to 330 copies/ml, except for one individual at the final time. Both assays were 98% consistent (108/110) in assessing pVL <50 copies/ml, but the Amplicor assay registered 56% of samples (19/34) as below the LLOQ that were in the 50 to 1000 copy/ml range as quantified by SCA. pVL changes between successive time points did not correlate with changes in cellular infection as measured through either total or episomal HIV DNA. Changes in pVL were correlated (negatively) with changes in total CD4(+) T cell numbers (p=0.003), naive (CD45RO(-)CD62L(+)CD4(+)), natural regulatory (CD45RO(-)CD25(+)CD127(-)CD4(+)), activated effector (CD45RO(+)CD38(++)CCR5(+)CD8(+)), but not activated (CD38(+)HLA-DR(+)) CD4(+) T cells. Patients receiving stable, seemingly suppressive ART can have pVL near the 50 copy LLOQ at multiple time points. The high Amplicor assay error rate around this level implies that viral blips underrepresent pVL being more consistently above the LLOQ. Activation of latently infected cells is less likely to contribute to this phenomenon.
病毒波动(即HIV RNA血浆病毒载量(pVL)间歇性升高至检测下限以上)令人担忧。我们对其成因研究了多种假设。我们使用两种检测方法,对16名开始接受由拉替拉韦与替诺福韦/恩曲他滨组成的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)治疗3年的个体的HIV RNA、HIV总DNA和游离DNA进行了评估:一种单拷贝检测法[SCA;定量下限(LLOQ),<1拷贝/毫升]和Amplicor检测法(LLOQ为50拷贝/毫升)。两名个体出现了病毒波动。从第20周起,即ART达到最终抑制水平的时期,除最后一名个体外,pVL范围为<1至� 30拷贝/毫升。在评估pVL<50拷贝/毫升时,两种检测方法的一致性为98%(108/110),但Amplicor检测法将56%的样本(19/34)记录为低于LLOQ,而这些样本经SCA定量在50至1000拷贝/毫升范围内。连续时间点之间的pVL变化与通过HIV总DNA或游离DNA测量的细胞感染变化不相关。pVL变化与总CD4(+) T细胞数量变化呈负相关(p = 0.003),与初始(CD45RO(-)CD62L(+)CD4(+))、天然调节性(CD45RO(-)CD25(+)CD127(-)CD4(+))、活化效应性(CD45RO(+)CD38(++)CCR5(+)CD8(+))T细胞相关,但与活化(CD38(+)HLA-DR(+))CD4(+) T细胞无关。接受稳定、看似具有抑制作用的ART的患者在多个时间点的pVL可能接近50拷贝的LLOQ。在此水平附近,Amplicor检测法的高错误率意味着病毒波动可能低估了pVL更持续高于LLOQ的情况。潜伏感染细胞的活化不太可能导致这种现象。