Dy Christopher J, Lyman Stephen, Schreiber Joseph J, Do Huong T, Daluiski Aaron
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Sep;38(9):1705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
We used a statewide database to determine the incidence of pulley reconstruction and to evaluate the influence of demographics on reoperation. We hypothesized that age, insurance status, and concomitant nerve or tendon procedure would influence the likelihood of reoperation.
We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System ambulatory surgery database from New York, which represents all outpatient surgery in the state. Patients who had flexor pulley reconstruction from 1998 to 2009 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology 4 codes. Subsequent surgery records for these patients were identified through 2010, allowing at least 1 year follow-up. Concomitant nerve procedure and flexor tendon repair/reconstruction were identified. The type and timing of subsequent procedures, including tenolysis and repeat pulley reconstruction, were recorded. Univariate statistics were calculated to compare age, sex, and payer type between patients with and without reoperation. A multivariable, logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association of the demographics with the chances of having reoperation.
There were 623 patients who had flexor pulley reconstruction from 1998 to 2009. The incidence of pulley reconstruction was 0.27 per 100,000 persons, with an annual frequency of 52 procedures. There were 39 (6%) reoperations. There was no difference in age, concomitant nerve or tendon repair, or workers' compensation between patients with and without reoperation. Regression modeling showed a higher likelihood among men of having reoperation.
Flexor pulley reconstructions are rare. One-quarter of surgeons performed only one flexor pulley reconstruction over a 12-year period. The 6% reoperation rate is similar to our previous findings for flexor tendon repair using similar methodology. Our report provides information that may be useful in counseling patients.
我们使用一个全州范围的数据库来确定滑车重建的发生率,并评估人口统计学因素对再次手术的影响。我们假设年龄、保险状况以及同时进行的神经或肌腱手术会影响再次手术的可能性。
我们使用了纽约州的全州规划与研究合作系统门诊手术数据库,该数据库涵盖了该州所有的门诊手术。通过当前手术操作术语4编码识别出1998年至2009年期间进行屈指肌腱滑车重建的患者。这些患者的后续手术记录追踪至2010年,以确保至少有1年的随访期。确定同时进行的神经手术以及屈指肌腱修复/重建情况。记录后续手术的类型和时间,包括肌腱松解术和再次滑车重建。计算单变量统计量以比较再次手术患者与未再次手术患者之间的年龄、性别和付款人类型。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估人口统计学因素与再次手术几率之间的关联。
1998年至2009年期间有623例患者进行了屈指肌腱滑车重建。滑车重建的发生率为每10万人中有0.27例,每年进行52例手术。有39例(6%)再次手术。再次手术患者与未再次手术患者在年龄、同时进行的神经或肌腱修复以及工伤赔偿方面没有差异。回归模型显示男性再次手术的可能性更高。
屈指肌腱滑车重建很少见。四分之一的外科医生在12年期间仅进行了1例屈指肌腱滑车重建。6%的再次手术率与我们之前使用类似方法进行屈指肌腱修复的研究结果相似。我们的报告提供了可能有助于向患者提供咨询的信息。