Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;7(3):329-37. doi: 10.1111/eip.12066. Epub 2013 Jul 14.
Young people who are experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) are at increased risk of being unemployed compared to either their same age peers in the general population, or those with other mental illnesses. Significant research has been conducted examining employment interventions for those with chronic psychotic illness. This has yielded strong results in favour of an intervention called individual placement and support (IPS). However, significantly less work has examined the benefit of this approach to those in FEP when the potential for vocational rehabilitation is perhaps greater. This study adds to the knowledge of vocational intervention in first-episode psychotic illness. Additionally, it expands this work into the areas of cognition, social cognition, social inclusion and economics.
The study is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing receiving high-quality FEP treatment as usual plus IPS (IPS + TAU) to a FEP treatment as usual (TAU) intervention alone within a specialized FEP service.
The study recruited 146 people attending a first-episode psychosis service over 2 years. They were assessed at baseline, 6 months (end of intervention) 12 and 18 months with a battery covering psychopathology, economic, demographic, social cognitive, cognitive and diagnostic variables.
This paper describes the methodology for the largest attempted study of IPS in FEP. This study has the capacity to answer questions about the benefits on illness and economic impacts of vocational recovery in FEP. Further, it has the capacity to extend knowledge about the contribution of cognitive and social cognitive factors to recovery in this domain.
与普通人群中的同年龄人群或其他精神疾病患者相比,首次出现精神病发作(FEP)的年轻人失业的风险更高。已经进行了大量研究来检验针对慢性精神病患者的就业干预措施。这为一种名为个体安置和支持(IPS)的干预措施提供了强有力的支持。然而,对于那些处于 FEP 阶段的人,这种方法的益处却明显较少,因为他们的职业康复潜力可能更大。这项研究增加了人们对首次发作的精神病患者的职业干预的了解。此外,它还将这项工作扩展到认知、社会认知、社会包容和经济学领域。
该研究是一项单盲、随机对照试验,比较了在专门的 FEP 服务中,接受高质量的 FEP 常规治疗加 IPS(IPS+TAU)与仅接受 FEP 常规治疗(TAU)干预的效果。
这项研究在两年内招募了 146 名参加首次精神病发作服务的人。他们在基线、6 个月(干预结束时)、12 个月和 18 个月时接受了涵盖精神病学、经济学、人口统计学、社会认知、认知和诊断变量的测试。
本文描述了 IPS 在 FEP 中最大规模尝试研究的方法。这项研究有能力回答有关 FEP 职业康复对疾病和经济影响的问题。此外,它还有能力扩展关于认知和社会认知因素对该领域康复的贡献的知识。