Suppr超能文献

检验修订版“准备好阅读!”的测量精度和不变性

Examining the measurement precision and invariance of the revised get ready to read!

作者信息

Farrington Amber L, Lonigan Christopher J

机构信息

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/0022219413495568. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Abstract

Children's emergent literacy skills are highly predictive of later reading abilities. To determine which children have weaker emergent literacy skills and are in need of intervention, it is necessary to assess emergent literacy skills accurately and reliably. In this study, 1,351 children were administered the Revised Get Ready to Read! (GRTR-R), and an item response theory analysis was used to evaluate the item-level reliability of the measure. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to examine whether items function similarly between subpopulations of children. The GRTR-R had acceptable reliability for children whose ability level was just below the mean. DIF for a small number of items was present for only two comparisons-children who were older versus younger and children who were White versus African American. These results demonstrate that the GRTR-R has acceptable reliability and limited DIF, enabling the screener to identify those at risk for developing reading problems.

摘要

儿童的早期读写能力对其后期阅读能力具有高度预测性。为了确定哪些儿童的早期读写能力较弱且需要干预,有必要准确且可靠地评估早期读写能力。在本研究中,对1351名儿童进行了修订版《准备好阅读!》(GRTR-R)测试,并采用项目反应理论分析来评估该测试在项目层面的信度。进行了差异项目功能(DIF)分析,以检验各项目在不同儿童亚群体中的功能是否相似。对于能力水平略低于平均水平的儿童,GRTR-R具有可接受的信度。仅在两组比较中出现了少数项目的DIF——年龄较大与较小的儿童,以及白人儿童与非裔美国儿童。这些结果表明,GRTR-R具有可接受的信度且DIF有限,这使得该筛查工具能够识别出有阅读问题发展风险的儿童。

相似文献

1
Examining the measurement precision and invariance of the revised get ready to read!
J Learn Disabil. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/0022219413495568. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
2
Identifying preschool children at risk of later reading difficulties: evaluation of two emergent literacy screening tools.
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):62-76. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345007. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
3
Psychometric profile of an experimental Emergent Literacy Screener for preschoolers.
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Mar;33(1):120-136. doi: 10.1037/spq0000222. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Assessing preschoolers' emergent literacy skills in English and Spanish with the Get Ready to Read! screening tool.
Ann Dyslexia. 2007 Dec;57(2):161-78. doi: 10.1007/s11881-007-0007-9. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
5
An evaluation of two emergent literacy screening tools for preschool children.
Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Dec;59(2):115-31. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0026-9. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
6
Predictive validity of the get ready to read! Screener: concurrent and long-term relations with reading-related skills.
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):133-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326209. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
7
: A Children's Book for Emergent Literacy Screening During Well-Child Visits.
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3843.
8
Development of a Brief Screening Tool for Early Literacy Skills in Preschool Children.
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May-Jun;19(4):464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Development of a 5-item parent questionnaire to screen preschool children for reading problems.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Jun;53(6):571-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922814521285. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales.
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):728-43. doi: 10.1037/a0018966.
3
Identifying preschool children at risk of later reading difficulties: evaluation of two emergent literacy screening tools.
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):62-76. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345007. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
4
Predictive validity of the get ready to read! Screener: concurrent and long-term relations with reading-related skills.
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):133-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326209. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
6
Letter knowledge, phonological processing, and print knowledge: skill development in nonreading preschool children.
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Jul-Aug;39(4):296-305. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390040401.
7
Does low reading achievement at school entry cause conduct problems?
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(12):2443-8. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00247-2.
8
Relationship between scholastic and health behaviors and reading level in adolescent females.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000 May;39(5):275-80. doi: 10.1177/000992280003900503.
9
Child development and emergent literacy.
Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):848-72.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验