Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
To evaluate the efficacy of flow control of the internal carotid artery (ICA) by the clamping of the common carotid artery, external carotid artery, and superior thyroid artery during surgical ICA dissection to reduce ischemic complications after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Sixty-seven patients (59 men; age, 70.5 ± 6.2 years) who underwent CEA by the same surgeon were retrospectively studied. Both conventional CEA (n = 29) and flow-control CEA (n = 38) were performed with the patient under general anesthesia and with the use of somatosensory-evoked potential and near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring as a guide for selective shunting. The number of new postoperative infarcts was assessed with preoperative and postoperative diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) obtained within 3 days of surgery. In addition to surgical technique, the effects of the following factors on new infarcts also were examined: age, side of ICA stenosis, high-grade stenosis, symptoms, and application of shunting.
New postoperative DWI lesions were observed in 7 of 67 patients (10.4%), and none of them was symptomatic. With respect to operative technique, the incidence rate of DWI spots was significantly lower in the flow-control group (2.6%) than in the conventional group (20.7%), odds ratio: 0.069; 95% confidence interval: 0.006-0.779; P = 0.031). On multiple logistic regression analysis, age, side of ICA stenosis, high-grade stenosis, symptoms, and the use of internal shunting did not have significant effects on new postoperative DWI lesions, whereas technique did have an effect.
The proximal flow-control technique for CEA helps avoid embolic complications during surgical ICA dissection.
评估在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中通过夹闭颈总动脉、颈外动脉和甲状腺上动脉来控制颈内动脉(ICA)血流,以减少 CEA 后缺血性并发症的效果。
回顾性研究了由同一位外科医生进行 CEA 的 67 名患者(59 名男性;年龄 70.5 ± 6.2 岁)。常规 CEA(n = 29)和流量控制 CEA(n = 38)均在全身麻醉下进行,并使用体感诱发电位和近红外光谱监测作为选择性分流的指导。通过术前和术后 3 天内获得的弥散加权图像(DWIs)评估新术后梗死的数量。除手术技术外,还检查了以下因素对新梗死的影响:年龄、ICA 狭窄侧、高级别狭窄、症状和分流的应用。
在 67 名患者中有 7 名(10.4%)观察到新的术后 DWI 病变,且均无症状。就手术技术而言,流量控制组(2.6%)的 DWI 点发生率明显低于常规组(20.7%),比值比:0.069;95%置信区间:0.006-0.779;P = 0.031)。多元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、ICA 狭窄侧、高级别狭窄、症状和内分流的使用对新术后 DWI 病变没有显著影响,而技术则有影响。
CEA 的近端血流控制技术有助于避免手术 ICA 分离期间的栓塞并发症。