Caulfield Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Caulfield Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2494-2501. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
To examine the intra- and interrater reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) for lower limb assessment of adults with chronic neurologic injuries.
Single-center intra- and interrater reliability study.
Outpatient neurorehabilitation unit.
Adults (N=30; mean age ± SD, 54.1±12.5y) with various chronic neurologic injuries and lower limb spasticity.
Two experienced physiotherapists performed slow (R2) and fast (R1) passive movements for lower limb muscles half an hour apart on the same day (interrater reliability), while a third physiotherapist took goniometric measurements only. One physiotherapist repeated the assessment 1 to 3 days earlier or later (intrarater reliability). Assessors qualitatively rated the resistance to fast passive movements.
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated for R1, R2, and R2-R1. Kappa coefficients were calculated for tibialis range of movement and qualitative spasticity ratings.
Intra- and interrater R1 and R2 measurements showed moderate to high reliability for the affected hamstrings, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, soleus (mean ICC ± SD, .79±.08), and tibialis anterior (mean κ ± SD, .58±.10). Only intrarater measurements of the affected tibialis posterior were moderately reliable (R1=.57, R2=.77). Seven of 16 spasticity angle measurements of the affected muscles were moderately reliable. LOA were mostly unacceptably wide. Qualitative spasticity ratings were moderately reliable for affected hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and tibialis muscles (mean κ ± SD, .52±.10).
The MTS is reliable for assessing spasticity in most lower limb muscles of adults with chronic neurologic injuries. Repeated MTS measurements of spasticity are best based on R1 measurements rather than spasticity angle or qualitative ratings of spasticity. Optimally, MTS measurements should be undertaken by the same clinician.
研究改良 Tardieu 量表(MTS)在评估慢性神经损伤成人下肢时的组内和组间可靠性。
单中心组内和组间可靠性研究。
门诊神经康复病房。
30 名患有各种慢性神经损伤和下肢痉挛的成年人(平均年龄±标准差,54.1±12.5 岁)。
两名经验丰富的物理治疗师在同一天间隔半小时对下肢肌肉进行缓慢(R2)和快速(R1)被动运动,而第三名物理治疗师仅进行角度测量。一名物理治疗师在 1 至 3 天前或后重复评估(组内可靠性)。评估者对快速被动运动的阻力进行定性评估。
计算 R1、R2 和 R2-R1 的组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限(LOA)。计算胫骨活动范围和定性痉挛评级的kappa 系数。
受影响的腘绳肌、股直肌、腓肠肌、比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的 R1 和 R2 测量值具有中等至高的组内和组间可靠性(平均 ICC±标准差,.79±.08),而受影响的胫骨后肌的 R1 和 R2 测量值仅为中度可靠(R1=.57,R2=.77)。受影响肌肉的 16 个痉挛角度测量值中有 7 个具有中等可靠性。LOA 大多不可接受地宽。受影响的腘绳肌、腓肠肌和胫骨前肌的定性痉挛评级具有中等可靠性(平均 κ±标准差,.52±.10)。
MTS 可靠地评估慢性神经损伤成人下肢大多数肌肉的痉挛。痉挛的 MTS 重复测量最好基于 R1 测量,而不是痉挛角度或痉挛的定性评估。最佳情况下,MTS 测量应由同一位临床医生进行。