Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, San Sebastiano Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Correggio (Reggio Emilia), Correggio, Italy.
Merlo Bioengineering, Parma, Italy.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0287220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287220. eCollection 2023.
Equinus foot deformity (EFD) is the most common deviation after stroke. Several physiotherapy interventions have been suggested to treat it. However, studies evaluating the efficacy of these treatments vary widely in terms of assessment modalities, type of data analysis, and nomenclature. This scoping review aimed to map current available evidence on outcome measures and the modalities employed to assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy programs for the reduction of triceps surae (TS) spasticity and EFD in patients with stroke.
Scoping review methodological frameworks have been used. Three databases were investigated. Primary literature addressing TS spasticity in adult patients with stroke using physiotherapy interventions was included. Findings were systematically summarized in tables according to the intervention used, intervention dosage, control group, clinical, and instrumental outcome measures.
Of the 642 retrieved studies, 53 papers were included. TS spasticity was assessed by manual maneuvers performed by clinicians (mainly using the Ashworth Scale), functional tests, mechanical evaluation through robotic devices, or instrumental analysis and imaging (such as the torque-angle ratio, the H-reflex, and ultrasound images). A thorough critical appraisal of the construct validity of the scales and of the statistics employed was provided, particularly focusing on the choice of parametric and non-parametric approaches when using ordinal scales. Finally, the complexity surrounding the concept of "spasticity" and the possibility of assessing the several underlying active and passive causes of EFD, with a consequent bespoke treatment for each of them, was discussed.
This scoping review provides a comprehensive description of all outcome measures and assessment modalities used in literature to assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatments, when used for the reduction of TS spasticity and EFD in patients with stroke. Clinicians and researchers can find an easy-to-consult summary that can support both their clinical and research activities.
马蹄足畸形(EFD)是中风后最常见的畸形。已经提出了几种物理治疗干预措施来治疗它。然而,评估这些治疗方法疗效的研究在评估方式、数据分析类型和命名方面差异很大。本范围综述旨在绘制当前关于评估物理治疗方案对降低中风患者比目鱼肌(TS)痉挛和 EFD 有效性的结果测量和方法的可用证据。
使用范围综述方法框架。调查了三个数据库。纳入了使用物理治疗干预措施治疗成人中风患者 TS 痉挛的主要文献。根据使用的干预措施、干预剂量、对照组、临床和仪器结果测量,将研究结果系统地总结在表格中。
从 642 篇检索到的研究中,有 53 篇文章被纳入。TS 痉挛由临床医生进行的手动操作(主要使用 Ashworth 量表)、功能测试、通过机器人设备进行的机械评估或仪器分析和成像(如扭矩角度比、H 反射和超声图像)来评估。对量表的构建有效性和所使用的统计数据进行了深入的批判性评估,特别是当使用顺序量表时,重点关注参数和非参数方法的选择。最后,讨论了“痉挛”概念的复杂性以及评估 EFD 几个潜在主动和被动原因的可能性,并为每个原因提供了专门的治疗。
本范围综述全面描述了文献中用于评估物理治疗对中风患者 TS 痉挛和 EFD 降低疗效的所有结果测量和评估方法。临床医生和研究人员可以找到易于查阅的摘要,为他们的临床和研究活动提供支持。