Dewey Hall, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Feb;42(2):173-83. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9777-1.
The current study examined the congruence of parent and adolescent reports of positive and negative parenting with observations of parent-adolescent interactions as the criterion measure. The role of parent and adolescent depressive symptoms in moderating the associations between adolescent or parent report and observations of parenting also was examined. Participants were 180 parents (88.9 % female) with a history of clinical depression and one of their 9-to-15 year old children (49.4 % female). Parents and adolescents reported on parenting skills and depressive symptoms, and parenting was independently observed subsequently in the same session. Findings indicated adolescent report of positive, but not negative, parenting was more congruent with observations than parent report. For negative parenting, depressive symptoms qualified the relation between the parent or adolescent report and independent observations. For parents, higher levels of depressive symptoms were associated with more congruence with observed parenting (supporting a depressive realism hypothesis) whereas an opposite trend emerged for adolescents (providing some supporting evidence for a depression-distortion hypothesis).
本研究考察了父母和青少年对积极和消极教养方式的报告与观察到的父母-青少年互动之间的一致性,后者作为标准衡量标准。还研究了父母和青少年抑郁症状在调节青少年或父母报告与教养观察之间的关系中的作用。参与者包括 180 名有临床抑郁病史的父母和他们 9 至 15 岁的孩子中的一名(49.4%为女性)。父母和青少年报告了教养技能和抑郁症状,随后在同一会议上独立观察了教养情况。研究结果表明,青少年对积极教养的报告比父母报告更符合观察结果,而对消极教养的报告则不然。对于消极教养,抑郁症状限定了父母或青少年报告与独立观察之间的关系。对于父母来说,较高水平的抑郁症状与与观察到的教养更一致(支持抑郁现实主义假设),而青少年则出现相反的趋势(为抑郁扭曲假设提供了一些支持证据)。