Wilbanks Bryan A, Moss Jacqueline A, Berner Eta S
Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2013 Aug;31(8):359-67. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e31829a8f4b.
Anesthesia information management systems must often be tailored to fit the environment in which they are implemented. Extensive customization necessitates that systems be analyzed for both accuracy and completeness of documentation design to ensure that the final record is a true representation of practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a recently installed system in the capture of key perianesthesia data. This study used an observational design and was conducted using a convenience sample of nurse anesthetists. Observational data of the nurse anesthetists'delivery of anesthesia care were collected using a touch-screen tablet computer utilizing an Access database customized observational data collection tool. A questionnaire was also administered to these nurse anesthetists to assess perceived accuracy, completeness, and satisfaction with the electronic documentation system. The major sources of data not documented in the system were anesthesiologist presence (20%) and placement of intravenous lines (20%). The major sources of inaccuracies in documentation were gas flow rates (45%), medication administration times (30%), and documentation of neuromuscular function testing (20%)-all of the sources of inaccuracies were related to the use of charting templates that were not altered to reflect the actual interventions performed.
麻醉信息管理系统通常必须进行定制,以适应其实施的环境。广泛的定制要求对系统进行分析,以确保文档设计的准确性和完整性,从而保证最终记录能真实反映实际操作情况。本研究的目的是确定最近安装的一个系统在获取关键麻醉后护理数据方面的准确性。本研究采用观察性设计,以麻醉护士的便利样本进行。使用配备了利用Access数据库定制的观察性数据收集工具的触摸屏平板电脑,收集麻醉护士提供麻醉护理的观察数据。还向这些麻醉护士发放了一份问卷,以评估他们对电子文档系统的感知准确性、完整性和满意度。系统中未记录的数据的主要来源是麻醉医生在场情况(20%)和静脉输液管放置情况(20%)。文档记录不准确的主要来源是气体流速(45%)、用药时间(30%)和神经肌肉功能测试记录(20%)——所有不准确的来源都与未根据实际执行的干预措施进行修改的图表模板的使用有关。