Liu Yun, Kau Chung How, Pan Feng, Zhou Hong, Zhang Qiang, Zacharopoulos Georgios Vasileiou
Stomatology Healthcare Center, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):e353-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182902e5d.
The use of 3-dimensional (3D) facial imaging has taken greater importance as orthodontists use the soft tissue paradigm in the evaluation of skeletal disproportion. Studies have shown that faces defer in populations. To date, no anthropometric evaluations have been made of Chinese and Greek faces.
The aim of this study was to compare facial morphologies of Greeks and Chinese using 3D facial anthropometric landmarks.
Three-dimensional facial images were acquired via a commercially available stereophotogrammetric camera capture system. The 3dMD face system captured 245 subjects from 2 population groups (Chinese [n = 72] and Greek [n = 173]), and each population was categorized into male and female groups for evaluation. All subjects in the group were between 18 and 30 years old and had no apparent facial anomalies. Twenty-five anthropometric landmarks were identified on the 3D faces of each subject. Soft tissue nasion was set as the "zeroed" reference landmark. Twenty landmark distances were constructed and evaluated within 3 dimensions of space. Six angles, 4 proportions, and 1 construct were also calculated. Student t test was used to analyze each data set obtained within each subgroup.
Distinct facial differences were noted between the subgroups evaluated. When comparing differences of sexes in 2 populations (eg, male Greeks and male Chinese), significant differences were noted in more than 80% of the landmark distances calculated. One hundred percent of the angular were significant, and the Chinese were broader in width to height facial proportions. In evaluating the lips to the esthetic line, the Chinese population had more protrusive lips.
There are differences in the facial morphologies of subjects obtained from a Chinese population versus that of a Greek population.
随着正畸医生在评估骨骼不对称时采用软组织范例,三维(3D)面部成像的应用变得越发重要。研究表明,不同人群的面部存在差异。迄今为止,尚未对中国和希腊人群的面部进行人体测量学评估。
本研究旨在使用3D面部人体测量标志点比较希腊人和中国人的面部形态。
通过商用立体摄影测量相机捕捉系统获取三维面部图像。3dMD面部系统从两个群体(中国人[n = 72]和希腊人[n = 173])中采集了245名受试者的图像,每个群体又分为男性和女性组进行评估。该组所有受试者年龄在18至30岁之间,且面部无明显异常。在每个受试者的3D面部上确定了25个测量标志点。将软组织鼻根点设为“归零”参考标志点。在三维空间内构建并评估了20个标志点距离。还计算了6个角度、4个比例和1个结构。使用学生t检验分析每个亚组内获得的每个数据集。
在评估的亚组之间发现了明显的面部差异。在比较两个群体中不同性别的差异时(例如,希腊男性和中国男性),在计算的80%以上的标志点距离中发现了显著差异。所有角度的差异均具有显著性,中国人面部的宽高比例更大。在评估嘴唇与审美线的关系时,中国人的嘴唇更突出。
中国人群受试者与希腊人群受试者的面部形态存在差异。