Phillip J, Schubert G E, Thiel A, Wolters U
Innere Abteilung des Krankenhauses St. Josef, Wuppertal.
Med Klin (Munich). 1990 Jul 15;85(7):415-20.
Looking at clinical side-effects, effectiveness and tolerability, we compared the salinic solution "Golytely" vs. a conventional preparatory procedure (Cascara-Salax) in a prospective study including 28 patients with macroscopic normal mucosa. Mucosal changes in colonic step biopsies were investigated according to prefixed criteria.
There was no significant difference concerning weight, blood pressure, pulse rate, body temperature or essential laboratory findings. Whereas preparation using Cascara-Salax was less molesting stated by the patients, there was no difference in the way colonoscopy itself was tolerated in both groups. The performing doctor's evaluation of the colonic cleaning effect and examination conditions showed "Golytely" significantly ahead of Cascara-Salax. Histologically, colonic mucous layers depicted changes in the control groups in 63% vs. 40% in the "Golytely" group. "Golytely" seems to provide a safe and effective method of preparation for colonoscopy.
在一项前瞻性研究中,我们观察了临床副作用、有效性和耐受性,比较了“聚乙二醇电解质散”(Golytely)与传统的肠道准备程序(番泻叶-沙拉克斯),该研究纳入了28例宏观黏膜正常的患者。根据既定标准对结肠阶段性活检的黏膜变化进行了研究。
在体重、血压、脉搏率、体温或基本实验室检查结果方面没有显著差异。虽然患者表示使用番泻叶-沙拉克斯进行肠道准备的干扰较小,但两组在结肠镜检查的耐受方式上没有差异。执行医生对结肠清洁效果和检查条件的评估显示,“聚乙二醇电解质散”明显优于番泻叶-沙拉克斯。组织学上,对照组结肠黏液层有变化的比例为63%,而“聚乙二醇电解质散”组为40%。“聚乙二醇电解质散”似乎为结肠镜检查提供了一种安全有效的肠道准备方法。