de Melo Maria de Fátima Batista, Melo Saulo Leonardo Sousa, Zanet Tiago Gorgulho, Fenyo-Pereira Marlene
Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil.
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):76-80. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114960.
To analyze the density of the midpalatal suture by means of digital radiographs three months after retention to evaluate if this period of retention is really sufficient for bone repair.
This prospective study consisted of 31 patients (11 girls and 20 boys) in the mixed or permanent dentition stage, treated using a tooth-tissue borne expanders (Haas). Occlusal digital radiographs were taken at three stages: prior to rapid maxillary expansion (Stage I); immediately after desired maxillary expansion (Stage II); and after three months of retention (Stage III). Radiographs were taken on a dental X-ray machine, set at 70 kVp and 7 mA with an exposure time of 0.04 s. A phosphor storage plate system, imaging plate size n. 2 (35 × 45 × 1.6 mm), was used. Three regions (A, B and C) measured 0.02 mm² were selected for optical density analysis. The difference between the measurements was evaluated with the paired t-test.
The optical density was reduced at Stages II and III compared with Stage I. Between-stage comparison showed statistically significant changes for all variables (P < 0.05), with the highest mean optical density at Stage I and the lowest at Stage II, in all groups. Actually, there was an increase in optical density between Stages II and III, but they are reduced compared with Stage I.
The results strongly suggest that bone formation did not occur as expected, and that a longer retention period for bone repair may be necessary.
通过保留三个月后的数字化X线片分析腭中缝的密度,以评估这段保留时间是否真的足以实现骨修复。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了31例处于混合牙列或恒牙列期的患者(11名女孩和20名男孩),他们使用牙组织支持式扩弓器(哈斯扩弓器)进行治疗。在三个阶段拍摄咬合数字化X线片:快速上颌扩弓前(第一阶段);达到预期上颌扩弓后立即(第二阶段);以及保留三个月后(第三阶段)。X线片在牙科X线机上拍摄,设置为70 kVp和7 mA,曝光时间为0.04秒。使用磷光存储板系统,成像板尺寸为2号(35×45×1.6 mm)。选择三个面积为0.02 mm²的区域(A、B和C)进行光密度分析。测量值之间的差异采用配对t检验进行评估。
与第一阶段相比,第二阶段和第三阶段的光密度降低。阶段间比较显示,所有变量均有统计学意义的变化(P < 0.05),所有组中第一阶段的平均光密度最高,第二阶段最低。实际上,第二阶段和第三阶段之间光密度有所增加,但与第一阶段相比仍降低。
结果强烈表明,骨形成未如预期发生,可能需要更长的保留时间来进行骨修复。