Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Prog Orthod. 2022 Oct 17;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00431-6.
Midpalatal suture (MPS) repair in growing patients after RPE has been previously reported. However, differences between young and adult patients for timing and pattern of MPS repair after rapid maxillary expansion are expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midpalatal suture repair pattern after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in adult patients.
The study included 21 patients (six males, 15 females) successfully treated with MARPE with a mean initial age of 29.1 years of age (SD = 8.0; range = 20.1-45.1). MPS repair was evaluated using maxillary axial and coronal sections derived from CBCT exams taken 16 months after the expansion (SD = 5.9). Objective and subjective assessments of MPS repair were performed. Objective assessments were performed measuring MPS bone density at anterior, median and posterior region of hard palate. Pre-expansion and post-retention bone density changes were evaluated using paired t tests (p < 0.05). Midpalatal suture bone repair was scored 0 to 3 considering, respectively, the complete absence of bone repair in the MPS, the repair of less than 50% of the MPS, the repair of more than 50% of the MPS and the complete repair of the MPS. Intra- and interexaminer reliability evaluation were assessed using Kappa coefficient.
The objective evaluation showed a significant higher bone density at the pre-expansion stage in all palatal regions. The reliability of the subjective method was adequate with intra- and interexaminer agreements varying from 0.807 to 0.904. Scores 1, 2 and 3 were found in 19.05%, 38.09% and 42.86% of the sample, respectively. The most common region demonstrating absence of bone repair was the middle third. The anterior third of the midpalatal suture was repaired in all patients.
A decreased bone density was observed after the retention period when compared to pre-expansion stage. Most adult patients demonstrated incomplete repair of the midpalatal suture 16 months after MARPE. However, adequate bone repair covering more than half of the hard palate extension was observed in 80.95% of the patients.
在上颌快速扩弓(RPE)后,已经有报道称对生长中的患者进行中隔缝(MPS)修复。然而,预计年轻患者和成年患者在 RPE 后进行中隔缝修复的时间和模式存在差异。本研究的目的是评估微型种植体辅助快速腭扩张(MARPE)后成年患者的中隔缝修复模式。
本研究纳入 21 名患者(6 名男性,15 名女性),均成功接受 MARPE 治疗,平均初始年龄为 29.1 岁(标准差=8.0;范围=20.1-45.1)。在扩弓后 16 个月,使用 CBCT 检查获得的上颌轴位和冠状位切片评估 MPS 修复情况(标准差=5.9)。对 MPS 修复进行客观和主观评估。客观评估包括测量硬腭前、中、后区 MPS 的骨密度。使用配对 t 检验(p<0.05)评估扩弓前和扩弓后保留阶段的骨密度变化。根据 MPS 中完全无骨修复、MPS 修复少于 50%、MPS 修复多于 50%和 MPS 完全修复,将中隔缝骨修复评分 0-3。评估了内、外检查者之间的可靠性,使用 Kappa 系数。
客观评估显示,所有腭区的 MPS 在扩弓前阶段的骨密度均显著较高。主观方法的可靠性良好,内、外检查者之间的一致性在 0.807 到 0.904 之间。在样本中分别发现了 19.05%、38.09%和 42.86%的评分 1、2 和 3。最常见的缺乏骨修复区域是中三分之一。所有患者的中隔缝前三分之一都得到了修复。
与扩弓前阶段相比,保留阶段的骨密度降低。大多数成年患者在 MARPE 后 16 个月时表现出中隔缝不完全修复。然而,80.95%的患者观察到足够的骨修复,覆盖硬腭扩展的一半以上。