Suppr超能文献

两种经颅磁刺激治疗慢性耳鸣方案的比较:突发重复经颅磁刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激的随机对照临床试验。

Comparison of two protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial of burst repetitive versus high-frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2014 Feb;35(2):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1487-5. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of two techniques of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to treat chronic tinnitus; continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) and high-frequency rTMS. In a controlled randomized clinical trial, 55 patients with chronic tinnitus were randomly divided in two groups. They received four sessions of treatment. cTBS was tested on one group and high-frequency rTMS (10 Hz) was tested on the other. Severity of the tinnitus was assessed before treatment, after the last treatment session and then 1-month later. Both the treatments of high-frequency and cTBS had a suppressive effect on tinnitus. However, cTBS was more effective than high-frequency rTMS (P = 0.001). This study suggests that rTMS even in four sessions is effective in reducing tinnitus severity; moreover, compared to high-frequency TMS better results can be achieved with cTBS.

摘要

本研究旨在比较两种经颅重复磁刺激(rTMS)技术治疗慢性耳鸣的效果;连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)和高频 rTMS。在一项对照随机临床试验中,将 55 例慢性耳鸣患者随机分为两组。他们接受了四次治疗。一组接受 cTBS 治疗,另一组接受高频 rTMS(10Hz)治疗。在治疗前、最后一次治疗后和 1 个月后评估耳鸣的严重程度。高频和 cTBS 治疗均对耳鸣有抑制作用。然而,cTBS 的效果优于高频 rTMS(P=0.001)。本研究表明,即使进行四次 rTMS 治疗,也能有效降低耳鸣严重程度;此外,与高频 TMS 相比,cTBS 可获得更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验