Suppr超能文献

中药治疗肥胖相关性高血压。

Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beixiange No. 5, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:757540. doi: 10.1155/2013/757540. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the clinical evidence of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for obesity-related hypertension. Search Strategy. Electronic databases were searched until January, 2013. Inclusion Criteria. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing CHM against nondrug therapy and conventional western medicine, or combined with conventional western medicine against conventional western medicine. Data Extraction and Analyses. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were conducted according to Cochrane standards. Results. 11 trials were included. Methodological quality was evaluated as low. 1 trial investigated the efficacy of CHM plus nondrug therapy versus nondrug therapy. Positive results in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD: -5.40 [-5.88, -4.92]; P < 0.00001) were found in combination group. 1 trial investigated the efficacy of CHM versus conventional western medicine. Positive results in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD: -1.39 [-2.11, -0.67]; P = 0.0002) were found in CHM. 9 trials investigated the efficacy of CHM plus conventional western medicine versus conventional western medicine. Positive results in SBP (WMD: -6.71 [-11.08, -1.25]; P = 0.02) were found in combination group. The safety of CHM is unknown. Conclusions. No definite conclusion could be got due to poor methodological quality. Rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm these results.

摘要

目的。评估中草药(CHM)治疗肥胖相关高血压的临床证据。

检索策略。截至 2013 年 1 月,检索电子数据库。

纳入标准。我们纳入了与非药物治疗和常规西药对照的 CHM 的随机临床试验(RCTs),或与常规西药联合的 RCTs。

数据提取和分析。根据 Cochrane 标准进行研究选择、数据提取、质量评估和数据分析。

结果。纳入 11 项试验。方法学质量评价为低。1 项试验评估了 CHM 联合非药物治疗与非药物治疗的疗效。联合组在舒张压(DBP)(WMD:-5.40 [-5.88, -4.92]; P < 0.00001)方面显示出阳性结果。1 项试验评估了 CHM 与常规西药的疗效。CHM 组在收缩压(SBP)(WMD:-1.39 [-2.11, -0.67]; P = 0.0002)方面显示出阳性结果。9 项试验评估了 CHM 联合常规西药与常规西药的疗效。联合组在 SBP(WMD:-6.71 [-11.08, -1.25]; P = 0.02)方面显示出阳性结果。CHM 的安全性未知。

结论。由于方法学质量差,无法得出明确的结论。需要设计严格的试验来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58d/3703329/3afd5316d798/ECAM2013-757540.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验