Suppr超能文献

基于弥散张量纤维束成像的扣带回束自动提取:伴有和不伴有痴呆的帕金森病的可行性研究。

Automatic extraction of the cingulum bundle in diffusion tensor tract-specific analysis: feasibility study in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(3):201-13. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0064. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Tract-specific analysis (TSA) measures diffusion parameters along a specific fiber that has been extracted by fiber tracking using manual regions of interest (ROIs), but TSA is limited by its requirement for manual operation, poor reproducibility, and high time consumption. We aimed to develop a fully automated extraction method for the cingulum bundle (CB) and to apply the method to TSA in neurobehavioral disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We introduce the voxel classification (VC) and auto diffusion tensor fiber-tracking (AFT) methods of extraction. The VC method directly extracts the CB, skipping the fiber-tracking step, whereas the AFT method uses fiber tracking from automatically selected ROIs. We compared the results of VC and AFT to those obtained by manual diffusion tensor fiber tracking (MFT) performed by 3 operators. We quantified the Jaccard similarity index among the 3 methods in data from 20 subjects (10 normal controls [NC] and 10 patients with Parkinson's disease dementia [PDD]). We used all 3 extraction methods (VC, AFT, and MFT) to calculate the fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the anterior and posterior CB for 15 NC subjects, 15 with PD, and 15 with PDD.

RESULTS

The Jaccard index between results of AFT and MFT, 0.72, was similar to the inter-operator Jaccard index of MFT. However, the Jaccard indices between VC and MFT and between VC and AFT were lower. Consequently, the VC method classified among 3 different groups (NC, PD, and PDD), whereas the others classified only 2 different groups (NC, PD or PDD).

CONCLUSION

For TSA in Parkinson's disease, the VC method can be more useful than the AFT and MFT methods for extracting the CB. In addition, the results of patient data analysis suggest that a reduction of FA in the posterior CB may represent a useful biological index for monitoring PD and PDD.

摘要

目的

束分析(TSA)通过纤维跟踪沿着通过手动感兴趣区(ROI)提取的特定纤维测量扩散参数,但 TSA 受到其手动操作的要求、较差的可重复性和高时间消耗的限制。我们旨在开发一种用于胼胝体束(CB)的全自动提取方法,并将该方法应用于神经行为障碍(如帕金森病(PD))的 TSA。

材料和方法

我们介绍了体素分类(VC)和自动扩散张量纤维跟踪(AFT)提取方法。VC 方法直接提取 CB,跳过纤维跟踪步骤,而 AFT 方法则使用自动选择 ROI 的纤维跟踪。我们将 VC 和 AFT 的结果与由 3 名操作员进行的手动扩散张量纤维跟踪(MFT)的结果进行了比较。我们量化了 20 名受试者(10 名正常对照[NC]和 10 名帕金森病痴呆[PDD]患者)数据中 3 种方法之间的杰卡德相似性指数。我们使用所有 3 种提取方法(VC、AFT 和 MFT)计算了 15 名 NC 受试者、15 名 PD 患者和 15 名 PDD 患者的前、后 CB 的各向异性分数(FA)值。

结果

AFT 和 MFT 结果之间的杰卡德指数为 0.72,与 MFT 的操作员间杰卡德指数相似。然而,VC 与 MFT 之间以及 VC 与 AFT 之间的杰卡德指数较低。因此,VC 方法对 3 个不同组(NC、PD 和 PDD)进行分类,而其他方法仅对 2 个不同组(NC、PD 或 PDD)进行分类。

结论

对于帕金森病的 TSA,VC 方法对于提取 CB 可能比 AFT 和 MFT 方法更有用。此外,患者数据分析结果表明,后 CB 的 FA 降低可能代表监测 PD 和 PDD 的有用生物学指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验