Suppr超能文献

使用情绪障碍问卷的韩文版评估韩国大学生的双相谱系障碍是否有用?

Is it useful to use the Korean version of the mood disorder questionnaire for assessing bipolar spectrum disorder among Korean college students?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Gwangju Mirae Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;6(2):170-8. doi: 10.1111/appy.12026. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of the Korean version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (K-MDQ) as a screening tool for the identification of bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) among Korean college students.

METHODS

The sample of 1,020 college students was stratified to reflect geographical differences among the students. The K-MDQ and an epidemiological survey were administered between November 2006 and February 2007. To validate the K-MDQ as a screening tool for BSD, the Korean version of the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (K-BSDS) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) were also administered.

RESULTS

The rates satisfying MDQ criterion 1, and all three MDQ criteria, were 55.5% and 2.3%, respectively. According to the K-BSDS, 59.9% of the sample met the criteria for BSD using a threshold of 10, while no statistical differences were observed among subgroups. When we examined the diagnostic agreement between K-MDQ and K-BSDS, 79.5% of students who met MDQ criterion 1 were also positive on the BSDS. Sixteen (21.6%) of the 74 students who participated in the SCID interview were diagnosed with BSD.

DISCUSSION

Although the K-MDQ is a useful tool to assess BSD among inpatients and outpatients, it does not appear useful as a screening tool to detect BSD among college students.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估 Mood Disorder Questionnaire(MDQ)韩文版(K-MDQ)作为一种筛查工具,用于识别韩国大学生中的双相谱系障碍(BSD)的有效性。

方法

本研究的样本量为 1020 名大学生,采用分层抽样的方法反映学生的地域差异。于 2006 年 11 月至 2007 年 2 月期间进行 K-MDQ 和流行病学调查。为了验证 K-MDQ 作为 BSD 的筛查工具的有效性,还进行了韩国双相谱诊断量表(K-BSDS)和 DSM-IV 结构临床访谈(SCID)。

结果

符合 MDQ 标准 1 的比例为 55.5%,符合 MDQ 所有三个标准的比例为 2.3%。根据 K-BSDS,使用 10 作为阈值,有 59.9%的样本符合 BSD 标准,各亚组之间无统计学差异。当我们检查 K-MDQ 和 K-BSDS 之间的诊断一致性时,符合 MDQ 标准 1 的学生中有 79.5%在 BSDS 上呈阳性。在参加 SCID 访谈的 74 名学生中,有 16 名(21.6%)被诊断为 BSD。

讨论

尽管 K-MDQ 是一种评估住院和门诊患者 BSD 的有用工具,但它似乎不适用于作为筛查工具来检测大学生中的 BSD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验