Department of Pediatrics, Center for Research, Innovation and Scholarship in Medical Education, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;25(3):301-10. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.790310.
Research is an important part of educational scholarship. Knowledge of research methodologies is essential for both conducting research as well as determining the soundness of the findings from published studies. Our goals for this paper therefore are to inform medical education researchers of the range and key components of educational research designs. We will discuss both qualitative and quantitative approaches to educational research. Qualitative methods will be presented according to traditions that have a distinguished history in particular disciplines. Quantitative methods will be presented according to an evidence-based hierarchy akin to that of evidence-based medicine with the stronger designs (systematic reviews and well conducted educational randomized controlled trials) at the top, and weaker designs (descriptive studies without comparison groups, or single case studies) at the bottom. It should be appreciated, however, that the research question determines the study design. Therefore, the onus is on the researcher to choose a design that is appropriate to answering the question. We conclude with an overview of how educational researchers should describe the study design and methods in order to provide transparency and clarity.
研究是教育学术的重要组成部分。了解研究方法对于进行研究以及确定已发表研究结果的可靠性至关重要。因此,本文的目的是让医学教育研究人员了解教育研究设计的范围和关键组成部分。我们将讨论教育研究的定性和定量方法。根据特定学科中具有悠久历史的传统,将介绍定性方法。根据类似于循证医学的循证层次结构,将介绍定量方法,其中较强的设计(系统评价和精心进行的教育随机对照试验)位于顶部,较弱的设计(无对照组的描述性研究或单个案例研究)位于底部。然而,应该理解的是,研究问题决定了研究设计。因此,研究人员有责任选择适合回答问题的设计。最后,我们概述了教育研究人员应如何描述研究设计和方法,以提供透明度和清晰度。