Department of Anesthesiology of The Ottawa Hospital & The University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;59(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9635-y. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
This article provides clinician-teachers with an overview of the process necessary to move from an initial idea to the conceptualization and implementation of an empirical study in the field of medical education. This article will allow clinician-teachers to become familiar with educational research methodology in order to a) critically appraise education research studies and apply evidence-based education more effectively to their practice and b) initiate or collaborate in medical education research.
This review uses relevant articles published in the fields of medicine, education, psychology, and sociology before October 2011.
The focus of the majority of research in medical education has been on reporting outcomes related to participants. There has been less assessment of patient care outcomes, resulting in informing evidence-based education to only a limited extent. This article explains the process necessary to develop a focused and relevant education research question and emphasizes the importance of theory in medical education research. It describes a range of methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, and concludes with a discussion of dissemination of research findings. A majority of studies currently use quantitative methods. This article highlights how further use of qualitative methods can provide insight into the nuances and complexities of learning and teaching processes.
Research in medical education requires several successive steps, from formulating the correct research question to deciding the method for dissemination. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages and should be chosen according to the question being asked and the specific goal of the study. Well-conducted education research should allow progression towards the important goal of using evidence-based education in our teaching and institutions.
本文为临床教师提供了一个概述,介绍了将初步想法转化为医学教育领域实证研究的概念化和实施所需的过程。本文将使临床教师熟悉教育研究方法,以便:a)批判性地评估教育研究,并将循证教育更有效地应用于实践;b)开展或合作开展医学教育研究。
本文使用了 2011 年 10 月之前在医学、教育、心理学和社会学领域发表的相关文章。
医学教育领域的大多数研究重点都放在报告与参与者相关的结果上。对患者护理结果的评估较少,因此仅在有限的程度上为循证教育提供了信息。本文解释了发展一个有重点和相关的教育研究问题所需的过程,并强调了理论在医学教育研究中的重要性。它描述了一系列方法,包括定量、定性和混合方法,并以讨论研究结果的传播结束。目前大多数研究都使用定量方法。本文强调了进一步使用定性方法如何深入了解学习和教学过程的细微差别和复杂性。
医学教育研究需要几个连续的步骤,从制定正确的研究问题到决定传播方法。每种方法都有其优点和缺点,应根据所提出的问题和研究的具体目标来选择。精心进行的教育研究应该能够朝着在教学和机构中使用循证教育的重要目标迈进。