Department of Philosophy, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky., USA.
Psychopathology. 2013;46(5):289-94. doi: 10.1159/000353357. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
In later editions of his General Psychopathology, Karl Jaspers prescribes many different methods and theoretical points of view for psychopathologists to utilize. Each of these perspectives on the subject matter of psychopathology, however, gives the investigator access to only one dimension of the patient's being. Hence, Jaspers insists that several different perspectives must be employed in order to avoid a one-sided and partial comprehension of the patient and his or her problem. He advocates a multiperspectival approach in psychopathology. Nevertheless, Jaspers remains aware that the patient is a unified whole. This unified whole, however, is not knowable as such, but can rather be approached only under the guidance of an 'idea' of the whole. Jaspers takes the basic notion of 'idea' (Idee) from Kant, but he modifies and uses it for his own purposes. Jaspers' multiperspectivalism may seem to invite charges of relativism because it leaves the psychopathologist to 'pick and choose' any method or theory he or she prefers. This charge is addressed by admitting that there does exist a certain relativism in Jaspers' position in that any one perspective does provide only one approach to the reality of the patient and that other equally useful perspectives could have been chosen. However, each perspective itself can be subjected to test by evidence, and in such tests, claims made from that perspective can be found to be true or false. Helen Longino's theory of scientific knowledge helps support such a thesis.
在他的《普通精神病理学》的后续版本中,卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯为精神病理学家规定了许多不同的方法和理论观点。然而,这些精神病理学主题的观点中的每一个都只让研究者能够接触到患者存在的一个维度。因此,雅斯贝尔斯坚持认为,为了避免对患者及其问题的片面和局部理解,必须采用几种不同的观点。他倡导精神病理学的多视角方法。然而,雅斯贝尔斯仍然意识到患者是一个统一的整体。然而,这个统一的整体不能被这样认知,而只能在对整体的“观念”的指导下接近。雅斯贝尔斯从康德那里借鉴了“观念”(Idee)的基本概念,但他对其进行了修改并将其用于自己的目的。雅斯贝尔斯的多视角主义似乎可能会引发相对主义的指控,因为它让精神病理学家可以“挑选”他或她喜欢的任何方法或理论。通过承认雅斯贝尔斯的立场确实存在一定的相对主义,可以解决这一指控,即任何一个视角确实只提供了一种接近患者现实的方法,而其他同样有用的视角本来也可以被选择。然而,每个视角本身都可以通过证据进行测试,并且在这种测试中,可以发现从该视角提出的主张是真实的还是虚假的。海伦·隆吉诺的科学知识理论有助于支持这样的论点。