Jeon Byeong Geon, Shin Rumi, Chung Jung Kee, Jung In Mok, Heo Seung Chul
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Coloproctol. 2013 Jun;29(3):106-14. doi: 10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.106. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an important prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, in some stages, it does not work. We performed this study to find a way in which preoperative CEA could be used as a constant prognostic marker in harmony with the TNM staging system.
Preoperative CEA levels and recurrences in CRC were surveyed. The distribution of CEA levels and the recurrences in each TNM stage of CRC were analyzed. An optimal cutoff value for each TNM stage was calculated and tested for validity as a prognostic marker within the TNM staging system.
The conventional cutoff value of CEA (5 ng/mL) was an independent prognostic factor on the whole. However, when evaluated in subgroups, it was not a prognostic factor in stage I or stage III of N2. A subgroup analysis according to TNM stage revealed different CEA distributions and recurrence rates corresponding to different CEA ranges. The mean CEA levels were higher in advanced stages. In addition, the recurrence rates of corresponding CEA ranges were higher in advanced stages. Optimal cutoff values from the receiver operating characteristic curves were 7.4, 5.5, and 4.5 ng/mL for TNM stage I, II, and III, respectively. Those for N0, N1, and N2 stages were 5.5, 4.8, and 3.5 ng/mL, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survivals were significantly different according to these cutoff values for each TNM and N stage. The multivariate analysis confirmed the new cutoff values to be more efficient in discriminating the prognosis in the subgroups of the TNM stages.
Individualized cutoff values of the preoperative CEA level are a more practical prognostic marker following and in harmony with the TNM staging system.
癌胚抗原(CEA)是结直肠癌(CRC)的一项重要预后标志物。然而,在某些阶段,它并不起作用。我们开展本研究以探寻一种方法,使术前CEA能够与TNM分期系统协同用作一种可靠的预后标志物。
调查CRC患者的术前CEA水平及复发情况。分析CEA水平分布及CRC各TNM分期中的复发情况。计算每个TNM分期的最佳临界值,并在TNM分期系统内作为预后标志物进行有效性测试。
CEA的传统临界值(5 ng/mL)总体上是一个独立的预后因素。然而,在亚组评估时,它在I期或N2的III期并非预后因素。根据TNM分期进行的亚组分析显示,不同CEA范围对应的CEA分布和复发率不同。晚期的平均CEA水平更高。此外,相应CEA范围的复发率在晚期更高。来自受试者工作特征曲线的最佳临界值,TNM I期、II期和III期分别为7.4、5.5和4.5 ng/mL。N0、N1和N2期分别为5.5、4.8和3.5 ng/mL。根据这些每个TNM和N分期的临界值,5年无病生存率有显著差异。多因素分析证实新的临界值在区分TNM分期亚组的预后方面更有效。
术前CEA水平的个体化临界值是一种更实用的预后标志物,与TNM分期系统相符且相辅相成。