Field Science Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Anim Sci J. 2014 Feb;85(2):186-92. doi: 10.1111/asj.12092. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
The present study sought to assess the potential application of avian models with different developmental modes to studies on cognition and neuroscience. Six altricial Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica), and eight precocial blue-breasted quails (Coturnix chinensis) were presented with color discrimination tasks to compare their respective faculties for learning and memory retention within the context of the two developmental modes. Tasks consisted of presenting birds with discriminative cues in the form of colored feeder lids, and birds were considered to have learned a task when 80% of their attempts at selecting the correctly colored lid in two consecutive blocks of 10 trials were successful. All of the finches successfully performed the required experimental tasks, whereas only half of the quails were able to execute the same tasks. In the learning test, finches required significantly fewer trials than quails to learn the task (finches: 13.5 ± 9.14 trials, quails: 45.8 ± 4.35 trials, P < 0.05), with finches scoring significantly more correct responses than quails (finches: 98.3 ± 4.08%, quails: 85.0 ± 5.77% at the peak of the learning curve). In the memory retention tests, which were conducted 45 days after the learning test, finches retained the ability to discriminate between colors correctly (95.0 ± 4.47%), whereas quails did not retain any memory of the experimental procedure and so could not be tested. These results suggested that altricial and precocial birds both possess the faculty for learning and retaining discrimination-type tasks, but that altricial birds perform better than precocial birds in both faculties. The present findings imply that developmental mode is an important consideration for assessing the suitability of bird species for particular experiments.
本研究旨在评估不同发育模式的禽类模型在认知和神经科学研究中的潜在应用。本研究选用 6 只晚成的虎皮鹦鹉(Lonchura striata var. domestica)和 8 只早成的鹌鹑(Coturnix chinensis)进行颜色辨别任务,以比较它们在两种发育模式下的学习和记忆保留能力。任务包括向鸟类呈现彩色饲料盖作为辨别线索,当鸟类在连续两个 10 次试验的块中成功选择正确颜色的盖子达到 80%时,就认为它们已经学会了任务。所有的虎皮鹦鹉都成功地完成了所需的实验任务,而只有一半的鹌鹑能够执行相同的任务。在学习测试中,虎皮鹦鹉学习任务所需的试验次数明显少于鹌鹑(虎皮鹦鹉:13.5±9.14 次,鹌鹑:45.8±4.35 次,P<0.05),并且虎皮鹦鹉的正确反应数明显多于鹌鹑(虎皮鹦鹉:98.3±4.08%,鹌鹑:85.0±5.77%,在学习曲线的峰值处)。在记忆保留测试中,该测试在学习测试后 45 天进行,虎皮鹦鹉仍然能够正确区分颜色(95.0±4.47%),而鹌鹑则没有保留任何对实验程序的记忆,因此无法进行测试。这些结果表明,晚成鸟和早成鸟都具有学习和保留辨别任务的能力,但晚成鸟在这两种能力上都比早成鸟表现得更好。本研究结果表明,发育模式是评估鸟类物种对特定实验适用性的一个重要考虑因素。