• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自问自答式的解释并不总是有帮助。

Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.

机构信息

Universidad de Valencia (Spain).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E26. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.45.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2013.45
PMID:23866220
Abstract

This study had two main purposes. First, to measure high-school students' task model representation under the instruction to self-explain questions; second, to test the effects of self-generated explanations on task-demands understanding and performance on questions. We designed a simple experimental situation where high-school students were asked to read two texts and answer questions. Only in half of the questions students were required to self-explain with their own words what the question was asking them for before answering. Contrary to our expectations, self-explaining the questions did not significantly affect skilled comprehenders, whereas it hindered performance in less-skilled comprehenders. Moreover, it inhibited their active engagement in search for textual units of information. Less-skilled comprehenders' explanation protocols included inaccuracies, with consequences on the search process and success in the task. The relationship among quality of task model, search for information and success is discussed in light of the TRACE model (Rouet, 2006).

摘要

本研究有两个主要目的。首先,测量高中生在自我解释问题指导下的任务模型表现;其次,检验自我生成的解释对任务需求理解和问题回答表现的影响。我们设计了一个简单的实验情境,要求高中生阅读两篇文本并回答问题。只有在一半的问题中,学生被要求用自己的话解释问题要求他们做什么,然后再回答。与我们的预期相反,自我解释问题并没有显著影响熟练的理解者,反而阻碍了不熟练的理解者的表现。此外,它抑制了他们主动寻找文本信息单元的积极性。不熟练的理解者的解释方案包含不准确之处,这对搜索过程和任务的成功产生了影响。根据TRACE 模型(Rouet,2006),讨论了任务模型质量、信息搜索和成功之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.自问自答式的解释并不总是有帮助。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E26. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.45.
2
Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading.任务导向性阅读中的策略性决策
Span J Psychol. 2015 Dec 28;18:E102. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.101.
3
Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.质疑和阅读目标:在不同任务条件下阅读科学文本时提出的信息寻求问题。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Sep;83(Pt 3):502-20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02079.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
4
Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.智障学生易懂的文本:影响理解的语言因素。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 May;27(3):212-25. doi: 10.1111/jar.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
5
Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: didactic and self-instructional training.比较两种教授提高阅读理解能力的问答策略的教学模式:讲授式和自我指导式训练。
J Learn Disabil. 1993 Apr;26(4):270-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600407.
6
The effect of concrete supplements on metacognitive regulation during learning and open-book test taking.混凝土外加剂对学习和开卷考试中元认知调节的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Jun;84(Pt 2):329-48. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12021. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
Why Sketching May Aid Learning From Science Texts: Contrasting Sketching With Written Explanations.为什么草图可能有助于从科学文本中学习:草图与书面解释对比。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;9(4):866-882. doi: 10.1111/tops.12261. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
[Reciprocal teaching and self-monitoring of strategy use: effects on reading comprehension].[相互教学与策略运用的自我监控:对阅读理解的影响]
Psicothema. 2011 Feb;23(1):38-43.
9
An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders.熟练与不太熟练的阅读理解者语义和语音处理的电生理研究。
Brain Lang. 2007 Jul;102(1):30-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.11.001. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
10
Oral and Written Expression in Children With Reading Comprehension Difficulties.阅读理解困难儿童的口语和书面表达
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Jan-Feb;49(1):65-76. doi: 10.1177/0022219414528539. Epub 2014 Apr 7.