• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么草图可能有助于从科学文本中学习:草图与书面解释对比。

Why Sketching May Aid Learning From Science Texts: Contrasting Sketching With Written Explanations.

机构信息

Multiple Representations Lab, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen.

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;9(4):866-882. doi: 10.1111/tops.12261. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1111/tops.12261
PMID:28328077
Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore two accounts for why sketching during learning from text is helpful: (1) sketching acts like other constructive strategies such as self-explanation because it helps learners to identify relevant information and generate inferences; or (2) that in addition to these general effects, sketching has more specific benefits due to the pictorial representation that is constructed. Seventy-three seventh-graders (32 girls, M = 12.82 years) were first taught how to either create sketches or self-explain while studying science texts. During a subsequent learning phase, all students were asked to read an expository text about the greenhouse effect. Finally, they were asked to write down everything they remembered and then answer transfer questions. Strategy quality during learning was assessed as the number of key concepts that had either been sketched or mentioned in the self-explanations. The results showed that at an overall performance level there were only marginal group differences. However, a more in-depth analysis revealed that whereas no group differences emerged for students implementing either strategy poorly, the sketching group clearly outperformed the self-explanation group for students who applied the strategies with higher quality. Furthermore, higher sketching quality was strongly related to better learning outcomes. Thus, the study's results are more in line with the second account: Sketching can have a beneficial effect on learning above and beyond generating written explanations; at least, if well deployed.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨记笔记对文本学习有益的两个原因

(1)记笔记的作用类似于自我解释等其他建构策略,因为它有助于学习者识别相关信息并生成推论;或者(2)除了这些一般影响外,由于构建了图像表示,记笔记还有更具体的好处。73 名七年级学生(32 名女生,M=12.82 岁)首先被教导如何在学习科学文本时创建草图或进行自我解释。在随后的学习阶段,所有学生都被要求阅读一篇关于温室效应的说明文。最后,他们被要求写下他们记得的所有内容,然后回答迁移问题。学习过程中的策略质量评估为在自我解释中被提及或绘制的关键概念的数量。结果表明,在整体表现水平上,各组之间只有微小的差异。然而,更深入的分析表明,对于实施策略较差的学生,没有出现组间差异,而对于应用策略质量较高的学生,记笔记组明显优于自我解释组。此外,更高的记笔记质量与更好的学习效果密切相关。因此,研究结果更符合第二种解释:记笔记可以对学习产生有益的影响,不仅可以生成书面解释,而且至少在合理运用的情况下。

相似文献

1
Why Sketching May Aid Learning From Science Texts: Contrasting Sketching With Written Explanations.为什么草图可能有助于从科学文本中学习:草图与书面解释对比。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;9(4):866-882. doi: 10.1111/tops.12261. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.不同文本类型的阅读理解水平:伊朗英语学习者对说明文和记叙文的字面理解与推理理解的比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1087-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9481-3.
3
Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.自问自答式的解释并不总是有帮助。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E26. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.45.
4
Comprehending 3D Diagrams: Sketching to Support Spatial Reasoning.理解三维图表:通过草图支持空间推理。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;9(4):883-901. doi: 10.1111/tops.12233. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
5
Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.材料 Matters:文本复杂度及其对中学生阅读理解加工的影响探索。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Apr 20;52(2):702-716. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00117. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Understanding abstract expository texts.理解摘要性说明文文本。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Jun;72(Pt 2):279-97. doi: 10.1348/000709902158892.
7
Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.研究文本中主要观点和示例的呈现与位置。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2003 Sep;73(Pt 3):291-316. doi: 10.1348/000709903322275849.
8
Strategies to read and learn: overcoming learning by consumption.阅读与学习策略:克服消费式学习。
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):340-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03550.x. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
9
Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: didactic and self-instructional training.比较两种教授提高阅读理解能力的问答策略的教学模式:讲授式和自我指导式训练。
J Learn Disabil. 1993 Apr;26(4):270-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600407.
10
Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.质疑和阅读目标:在不同任务条件下阅读科学文本时提出的信息寻求问题。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Sep;83(Pt 3):502-20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02079.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits from sketching for improving comprehension monitoring from illustrated texts.通过素描提高对图文文本的理解监测的益处。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02730-5.
2
Let Your Ideas Flow: Using Flowcharts to Convey Methods and Implications of the Results in Laboratory Exercises, Articles, Posters, and Slide Presentations.让你的思路流畅:在实验室练习、文章、海报和幻灯片展示中使用流程图来传达方法和结果的含义。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1477. eCollection 2018.