• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在研究中,哪种联系方法最适合招募参与者:给医疗保健研究人员的经验教训?

What method of contact works best for recruiting participants in a study: lessons for health care researchers?

作者信息

Iqbal Romania, Haroon Ali, Jabbar Abdul, Babar Neelofar, Qureshi Rahat

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Dec;62(12):1293-7.

PMID:23866476
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the various recruitment strategies used by medical researchers and their response rates.

METHODS

The observational study, part of a larger retrospective cohort, was done at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2008-December 2010, covering a period from 1999 to 2005. We used a multi-mode contact approach for including participants in the study. This comprised an invitational letter that described the study sent along with a mail-back, postage-paid envelope and multiple phone calls for recruitment of participants. The response to each mode was noted and described as frequency and percentage.

RESULTS

There were 1335 participants eligible for recruitment in the study. Of them, 1247 (93.4%) were sent mailouts to which only 84 (6.7%) responded. Besides, 1133 participants,whose phone numbers were available, were called. Overall, the number of people that we were able to contact was low. The response to postage paid mail was very poor whereas the majority of participants were contacted via phone calls. Out of such participants, 257 (19.25%) agreed to participate at the very first call and our results suggest that more than three calls made very little contribution to the consent rate.

CONCLUSION

Recruiting subjects from contact information available in the medical records may not be the best method. Multiple and innovative approaches are required for approaching potential participants and requesting them to participate in a study.

摘要

目的

评估医学研究人员使用的各种招募策略及其回应率。

方法

这项观察性研究是一项更大规模回顾性队列研究的一部分,于2008年5月至2010年12月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的阿迦汗大学医院进行,涵盖1999年至2005年期间。我们采用多模式联系方法将参与者纳入研究。这包括一封描述研究的邀请信,随信附上回邮已付邮资的信封,并多次致电招募参与者。记录每种模式的回应情况,并以频率和百分比进行描述。

结果

有1335名参与者符合该研究的招募条件。其中,1247名(93.4%)收到了邮件通知,只有84名(6.7%)做出了回应。此外,1133名有电话号码的参与者接到了电话。总体而言,我们能够联系到的人数较少。已付邮资邮件的回应非常差,而大多数参与者是通过电话联系的。在这些参与者中,257名(19.25%)在首次致电时就同意参与,我们的结果表明,超过三次致电对同意率的贡献很小。

结论

从病历中可用的联系信息招募受试者可能不是最佳方法。需要多种创新方法来接触潜在参与者并请求他们参与研究。

相似文献

1
What method of contact works best for recruiting participants in a study: lessons for health care researchers?在研究中,哪种联系方法最适合招募参与者:给医疗保健研究人员的经验教训?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Dec;62(12):1293-7.
2
A comparative analysis of recruitment methods used in a randomized trial of diabetes education interventions.一项糖尿病教育干预随机试验中使用的招募方法的比较分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):549-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
3
Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response.海因茨·尼克斯多夫召回研究的基线招募及无应答分析:电话号码的可识别性作为应答的主要决定因素
Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(6):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-5529-z.
4
Case report: patient portal versus telephone recruitment for a surgical research study.病例报告:手术研究中患者门户网站招募与电话招募的对比
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Dec 17;5(4):1005-14. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-07-CR-0059. eCollection 2014.
5
Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?介绍性明信片:它们会提高对老年人进行电话调查的回复率吗?
Health Educ Res. 2004 Apr;19(2):159-64. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg015.
6
Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].提高久坐患者对邮寄调查问卷的回应率——一项随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号45665423]
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Nov 10;4(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-31.
7
Repeated attempts using different strategies are important for timely contact with study participants.多次尝试使用不同策略对于及时联系研究参与者非常重要。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
8
Postal recruitment and consent obtainment from index cases of narcolepsy.发作性睡病索引病例的邮政招募及同意获取
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 16;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0089-1.
9
Recruiting 9126 Primary Care Patients by Telephone: Characteristics of Participants Reached on Landlines, Basic Cell Phones, and Smartphones.通过电话招募9126名初级保健患者:通过固定电话、基本手机和智能手机联系到的参与者特征。
Popul Health Manag. 2016 Jun;19(3):212-5. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0047. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
10
Challenges of recruiting farm injury study participants through hospital emergency departments.通过医院急诊科招募农场伤害研究参与者的挑战。
Inj Prev. 2007 Apr;13(2):88-92. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.013110.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining rTMS and Task-Oriented Training in the Rehabilitation of the Arm after Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.重复经颅磁刺激与任务导向训练相结合用于脑卒中后上肢康复:一项初步随机对照试验
Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:539146. doi: 10.1155/2013/539146. Epub 2013 Dec 3.