• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health education interventions to raise awareness of rheumatic fever: a systematic review protocol.健康教育干预措施以提高风湿热意识:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 18;2:58. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-58.
2
The role of social determinants of health in the risk and prevention of group A streptococcal infection, acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: A systematic review.社会决定因素在 A 组链球菌感染、急性风湿热和风湿性心脏病风险和预防中的作用:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 13;12(6):e0006577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006577. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Preventive Interventions to Reduce the Burden of Rheumatic Heart Disease in Populations at Risk: A Systematic Review.预防干预措施以减轻风湿性心脏病在高危人群中的负担:系统评价。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):e032442. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032442. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Epidemiology, health systems and stakeholders in rheumatic heart disease in Africa: a systematic review protocol.非洲风湿性心脏病的流行病学、卫生系统及利益相关者:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 May 20;6(5):e011266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011266.
5
Structured review of primary interventions to reduce group A streptococcal infections, acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.对减少 A 组链球菌感染、急性风湿热和风湿性心脏病的主要干预措施进行系统评价。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Jun;57(6):797-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15514. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice of frontline physicians in Egyptian university hospitals regarding pharyngitis and acute rheumatic fever: a cross-sectional study that calls for action.评估埃及大学医院一线医生对咽炎和急性风湿热的知识、态度和实践:呼吁采取行动的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):2235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19658-5.
7
Prevention and control of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: the Cuban experience (1986-1996-2002).风湿热和风湿性心脏病的预防与控制:古巴经验(1986 - 1996 - 2002)
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 May-Jun;19(3):135-40.
8
Controlling acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in developing countries: are we getting closer?在发展中国家控制急性风湿热和风湿性心脏病:我们正在接近目标吗?
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015 Feb;27(1):116-23. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000164.
9
Evaluation of a Community-Led Program for Primordial and Primary Prevention of Rheumatic Fever in Remote Northern Australia.评价澳大利亚北部偏远地区一个以社区为基础的风湿热一级和二级预防项目。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10215. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610215.
10
Rheumatic heart disease: progress and challenges in India.风湿性心脏病:印度的进展与挑战。
Indian J Pediatr. 2013 Mar;80 Suppl 1:S77-86. doi: 10.1007/s12098-012-0853-2. Epub 2012 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of an educational intervention in improving healthcare workers' knowledge of early recognition, diagnosis and management of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in rural far-western Nepal: a pre/post-intervention study.教育干预对提高尼泊尔偏远西部地区医护人员对风湿热和风湿性心脏病的早期识别、诊断和管理知识的有效性:一项干预前后研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e059942. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059942.
2
Awareness of Rheumatic Heart Disease in Egypt: A National Multicenter Study.埃及风湿性心脏病认知情况:一项全国多中心研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Sep 4;8(9):108. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8090108.
3
Risk Factors for Acute Rheumatic Fever: Literature Review and Protocol for a Case-Control Study in New Zealand.急性风湿热的危险因素:新西兰病例对照研究的文献综述和方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224515.
4
Handheld echocardiography for screening and control of rheumatic heart disease study in Gezira state, Sudan: a double approach model.苏丹杰济拉州手持式超声心动图用于风湿性心脏病筛查与控制的研究:一种双途径模式
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Aug;8(4):500-507. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.07.04.
5
Enablers and barriers to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever among Māori aged 14-21 in New Zealand: a framework method study.新西兰 14-21 岁毛利族人群风湿热二级预防的促成因素和障碍:框架方法研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 17;16(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0700-1.
6
Using a mHealth tutorial application to change knowledge and attitude of frontline health workers to Ebola virus disease in Nigeria: a before-and-after study.使用移动健康教程应用程序改变尼日利亚一线卫生工作者对埃博拉病毒病的知识和态度:一项前后对照研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Feb 12;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0100-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The worldwide epidemiology of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease.全球急性风湿热和风湿性心脏病的流行病学。
Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb 22;3:67-84. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S12977.
2
School-based prevention of acute rheumatic fever: a group randomized trial in New Zealand.新西兰开展的一项基于学校的预防急性风湿热的群组随机试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Sep;28(9):787-94. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181a282be.
3
Is primary prevention of rheumatic fever the missing link in the control of rheumatic heart disease in Africa?风湿热的一级预防是非洲风湿性心脏病控制中缺失的环节吗?
Circulation. 2009 Aug 25;120(8):709-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.836510. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
4
Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: primary prevention is the cost effective option.风湿热和风湿性心脏病:一级预防是具有成本效益的选择。
Indian J Pediatr. 2008 Jan;75(1):86; author reply 86-7.
5
Rheumatic heart disease in developing countries.发展中国家的风湿性心脏病。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):439-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078039.
6
Acute rheumatic fever.急性风湿热
Lancet. 2005;366(9480):155-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66874-2.
7
Antibiotics for the primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever: a meta-analysis.用于急性风湿热一级预防的抗生素:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 May 31;5(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-5-11.
8
10-year educational programme aimed at rheumatic fever in two French Caribbean islands.针对法属加勒比地区两个岛屿风湿热的十年教育计划。
Lancet. 1996 Mar 9;347(9002):644-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91202-7.
9
Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project.社区范围教育对心血管疾病危险因素的影响。斯坦福五城市项目。
JAMA. 1990 Jul 18;264(3):359-65.

健康教育干预措施以提高风湿热意识:系统评价方案。

Health education interventions to raise awareness of rheumatic fever: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 18;2:58. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-58.

DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-2-58
PMID:23866796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3720575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a significant global health burden associated with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD), especially in developing countries. ARF and RHD most often strike children and young adults living in impoverished settings, where unhygienic conditions and lack of awareness and knowledge of streptococcal infection progression are common. Secondary prophylactic measures have been recommended in the past, but primary prevention measures have been gaining more attention from researchers frustrated by the perpetual prevalence of ARF and RHD in developing countries. Health education aims to empower people to take responsibility for their own well-being by gaining control over the underlying factors that influence health. We therefore conducted a review of the current best evidence for the use of health education interventions to increase awareness and knowledge of streptococcal pharyngitis and ARF.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This article describes the protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions aimed at increasing awareness and knowledge of the symptoms, causes and consequences of streptococcal pharyngitis, rheumatic fever and/or rheumatic heart disease. Studies will be selected in which the effect of an intervention is compared with either a pre-intervention or a control, targeting all possible audience types. Primary and secondary outcomes of interest are pre-specified. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and controlled clinical trials will be considered. We will search several bibliographic databases (for example, PubMed, EMBASE, World Health Organization Library databases, Google Scholar) and search sources for gray literature. We will meta-analyze included studies. We will conduct subgroup analyses according to intervention subtypes: printed versus audiovisual and mass media versus training workshops.

DISCUSSION

This review will provide evidence for the effectiveness of educational components in health promotion interventions in raising public awareness in regard to the symptoms, causes and consequences of streptococcal pharyngitis, ARF and/or RHD. Our results may provide guidance in the development of future intervention studies and programs.

摘要

背景

急性风湿热(ARF)和风湿性心脏病(RHD)在全球范围内给卫生健康带来了巨大负担,尤其是在发展中国家。ARF 和 RHD 常发生于生活在贫困环境中的儿童和青年人群中,这些地区卫生条件较差,人们对链球菌感染进展的认识和了解不足。过去曾推荐过二级预防措施,但由于发展中国家 ARF 和 RHD 的持续流行,研究人员越来越关注一级预防措施。健康教育旨在通过控制影响健康的潜在因素,使人们有能力为自己的健康负责。因此,我们对利用健康教育干预措施提高人们对链球菌性咽炎、ARF 和 RHD 的认识和了解的现有最佳证据进行了综述。

方法和设计

本文介绍了一项系统综述的方案,旨在评估旨在提高对链球菌性咽炎、风湿热和/或风湿性心脏病的症状、病因和后果的认识和了解的健康教育干预措施的有效性。将选择比较干预措施效果与干预前或对照组的研究,目标人群为所有可能的类型。主要和次要结局均为预先指定。将考虑随机对照试验、准随机试验、对照前后研究和对照临床试验。我们将检索多个文献数据库(例如 PubMed、EMBASE、世界卫生组织图书馆数据库、Google Scholar)和灰色文献来源。我们将对纳入的研究进行荟萃分析。我们将根据干预类型进行亚组分析:印刷品与视听材料,大众媒体与培训研讨会。

讨论

本综述将为健康教育成分在提高公众对链球菌性咽炎、ARF 和/或 RHD 的症状、病因和后果的认识方面的健康促进干预措施的有效性提供证据。我们的研究结果可能为未来干预研究和项目的开展提供指导。