Gerow Stephanie, Rispoli Mandy, Boles Margot B, Neely Leslie C
Texas A&M University, Educational Psychology, College Station , TX , USA.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2015 Jun;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.809812. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
To examine latency to criterion for reduction of challenging behaviour with and without stating a contingency statement immediately prior to a DRO procedure.
An ABAC design in which A was baseline, B was used to evaluate the efficacy of a DRO procedure, and C was used to evaluate the efficacy of a DRO procedure with a contingency statement.
The DRO with the contingency statement intervention was associated with a shorter latency to behaviour change than the DRO procedure without the contingency statement.
These preliminary findings from this case study highlight the importance of examining the efficiency of behaviour change procedures. Directions for future research are provided.
研究在实施消退法（DRO）程序之前立即陈述应急声明与否的情况下，减少挑战性行为达到标准的潜伏期。
采用ABAC设计，其中A为基线期，B用于评估消退法程序的效果，C用于评估带有应急声明的消退法程序的效果。
与没有应急声明的消退法程序相比，带有应急声明的消退法干预与行为改变的潜伏期更短相关。
该案例研究的这些初步结果突出了检验行为改变程序效率的重要性。提供了未来研究的方向。
