• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于访谈的综合权变分析:三十次重复与重新分析。

Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses: Thirty replications and reanalysis.

作者信息

Jessel Joshua, Hanley Gregory P, Ghaemmaghami Mahshid

机构信息

Western New England University and Child Study Center.

Western New England University.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):576-95. doi: 10.1002/jaba.316. Epub 2016 May 13.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.316
PMID:27174653
Abstract

The speed with which a functional analysis (FA) provides a convincing demonstration of the variables that influence problem behavior may be termed efficiency. Multiple FA formats have been developed to improve analytic efficiency while the core components of the Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, and Richman (1982/1994) procedures are maintained. We attempted to illustrate an alternative efficient process for conducting FAs of problem behavior that relied on modifying those core components. In Study 1, we describe 30 applications of the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (Hanley, Jin, Vanselow, & Hanratty, 2014), which required an average of 25 min of analysis. The first sessions of these analyses were reanalyzed in Study 2 to determine if contingencies that controlled problem behavior could be identified in only 3 to 5 min. This was the case in 80% of analyses.

摘要

功能分析(FA)用以令人信服地证明影响问题行为的变量的速度可被称为效率。为了提高分析效率,人们开发了多种FA形式,同时保留了Iwata、Dorsey、Slifer、Bauman和Richman(1982/1994)程序的核心组成部分。我们试图阐述一种用于对问题行为进行功能分析的替代高效流程,该流程依赖于对那些核心组成部分进行修改。在研究1中,我们描述了访谈知情综合权变分析(Hanley、Jin、Vanselow和Hanratty,2014)的30次应用,这些应用平均需要25分钟的分析时间。在研究2中,对这些分析的首次会话进行了重新分析,以确定是否仅在3至5分钟内就能识别出控制问题行为的权变因素。在80%的分析中情况确实如此。

相似文献

1
Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses: Thirty replications and reanalysis.基于访谈的综合权变分析:三十次重复与重新分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):576-95. doi: 10.1002/jaba.316. Epub 2016 May 13.
2
Interview-informed functional analyses: A comparison of synthesized and isolated components.基于访谈的功能分析:合成成分与分离成分的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):252-277. doi: 10.1002/jaba.384. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis.功能分析期间合成强化偶联与个体强化偶联的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):596-616. doi: 10.1002/jaba.314. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
Assessing the generality and durability of interview-informed functional analyses and treatment.评估访谈式功能分析和治疗的普遍性和持久性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Feb;52(1):271-285. doi: 10.1002/jaba.504. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
An interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis to inform the treatment of challenging behavior in a young child with autism.一项基于访谈的综合权变分析,为自闭症幼儿挑战性行为的治疗提供信息。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2018 Apr;21(3):202-207. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2018.1437839. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Achieving socially significant reductions in problem behavior following the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis: A summary of 25 outpatient applications.在基于访谈的综合应急分析后实现对问题行为具有社会意义的减少:25例门诊应用总结
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jan;51(1):130-157. doi: 10.1002/jaba.436. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
The Generality of Interview-Informed Functional Analyses: Systematic Replications in School and Home.基于访谈的功能分析的普遍性:在学校和家庭中的系统复制
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Mar;46(3):797-811. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2617-0.
8
An analysis of contingency statements in a DRO procedure: A case report.对消退法程序中应急情况陈述的分析:一则病例报告。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2015 Jun;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.809812. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Contingencies promote delay tolerance.偶发事件会增强延迟容忍度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):548-75. doi: 10.1002/jaba.333. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
10
Positive reinforcement as treatment for problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.正强化作为由负强化维持的问题行为的治疗方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):699-703. doi: 10.1002/jaba.54. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of consecutive controlled case series studies.连续对照病例系列研究的范围综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Apr;58(2):270-286. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
A Two Step Validation of the Performance-Based IISCA: A Trauma-Informed Functional Analysis Model.基于表现的IISCA的两步验证:一种创伤知情功能分析模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Apr 18;17(3):727-745. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00792-2. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Toward Maximizing Assessment Efficiency: A Synthesized Trial-Based Functional Analysis and Competing Stimulus Assessment.
迈向评估效率最大化:基于综合试验的功能分析与竞争性刺激评估
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;14(5):372. doi: 10.3390/bs14050372.
4
Increasing Access and Quality of Behavior-Analytic Services for the Latinx Population.提高拉丁裔人群获得行为分析服务的机会及服务质量。
Behav Soc Issues. 2021;30(1):13-38. doi: 10.1007/s42822-021-00064-0. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
Prioritizing choice and assent in the assessment and treatment of food selectivity.在食物选择性评估与治疗中优先考虑选择和赞同。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb 1;69(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2123196. eCollection 2023.
6
Planning Positive Reinforcement Cycles in Behavior Intervention Plans.在行为干预计划中规划积极强化循环。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Feb 4;15(3):924-937. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00663-8. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
On the Reliability and Treatment Utility of the Practical Functional Assessment Process.论实用功能评估过程的可靠性及治疗效用
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Feb 9;15(3):815-837. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00665-6. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Validating a Computerized Program for Supporting Visual Analysis During Functional Analysis: The Problem Behavior Multilevel Interpreter (PB.MI).验证功能分析期间支持视觉分析的计算机程序:问题行为多级解释器(PB.MI)。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 14;15(2):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00656-7. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Concerns About ABA-Based Intervention: An Evaluation and Recommendations.关注基于应用行为分析的干预:评估与建议。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jun;52(6):2838-2853. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05137-y. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
10
Advances in Our Understanding of Behavioral Intervention: 1980 to 2020 for Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.我们对行为干预的理解进展:1980年至2020年针对被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的个体
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Dec;51(12):4395-4410. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04481-9.