Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
Although the ambulatory setting is recognized as the best arena for optimizing antihypertensive drug treatment after a stroke, little is known about recent office-based antihypertensive drug treatment patterns in the United States. We assessed national trends in antihypertensive treatment for stroke patients in office-based medical practice.
Data from the 2000-2009 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys were analyzed comprising outpatient visits to physicians in office-based practice by patients aged 40 years or older with a diagnosis of stroke (weighted estimate=46,317,269). The main outcome measure was visits with a prescription of antihypertensive medication(s).
The proportion of total visits that included a prescription of antihypertensive medication was 35.6% in 2000-2002, 29.5% in 2003-2005, and 49.3% in 2006-2009 (P=.002); 50.9% were primary care physician (PCP) visits versus 26.2% neurologist visits (P<.0001). Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses confirmed a higher prescription rate in 2006-2009 versus 2000-2002 (1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.96) and PCP versus neurologists (2.82; 95% CI, 1.86-4.27). Use of 2 or more agent classes was 31.6% in 2000-2002, 44.2% in 2003-2005, and 56.7% in 2006-2009 (P=.014). Age-adjusted logistic regression analyses confirmed a higher prescription rate of 2 or more agent classes in 2006-2009 versus 2000-2002 (2.96; 95% CI, 1.40-6.24). There were no significant differences in agent class type or number between neurologists versus PCPs.
Over the last decade, there was a significant rise in the use of antihypertensive drugs and combination of agent classes for patients aged 40 years or older seen in an ambulatory setting with a diagnosis of stroke. PCPs were more likely than neurologists to prescribe these agents.
尽管在门诊环境中优化抗高血压药物治疗被认为是最佳的治疗领域,但在美国,关于最近基于门诊的抗高血压药物治疗模式的信息却很少。我们评估了美国在门诊医疗实践中对中风患者进行抗高血压治疗的全国趋势。
对 2000-2009 年全国门诊医疗调查的数据进行了分析,该调查包括在门诊就诊的 40 岁或以上患有中风(加权估计值=46317269)的患者。主要观察指标是就诊时开具抗高血压药物的处方。
2000-2002 年,总就诊中有 35.6%的就诊开具了抗高血压药物处方;2003-2005 年,这一比例为 29.5%;2006-2009 年,这一比例为 49.3%(P=.002);50.9%为初级保健医生(PCP)就诊,26.2%为神经科医生就诊(P<.0001)。年龄调整的逻辑回归分析证实,2006-2009 年与 2000-2002 年相比,处方率更高(1.81;95%置信区间[CI],1.10-2.96),PCP 与神经科医生相比(2.82;95%CI,1.86-4.27)。2000-2002 年,使用 2 种或更多药物类别治疗的比例为 31.6%;2003-2005 年为 44.2%;2006-2009 年为 56.7%(P=.014)。年龄调整的逻辑回归分析证实,2006-2009 年与 2000-2002 年相比,使用 2 种或更多药物类别的处方率更高(2.96;95%CI,1.40-6.24)。神经科医生与 PCP 之间在药物类别类型或数量方面没有显著差异。
在过去十年中,在门诊环境中对 40 岁或以上患有中风的患者使用抗高血压药物和联合使用药物类别的情况显著增加。与神经科医生相比,PCP 更有可能开出这些药物。