*Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; †Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; §Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ¶Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Thomas Jefferson University, Wilmington, Delaware; and **Division of Neurovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Neurosurgery Department, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Retina. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(10):2103-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318295f783.
To determine the efficacy of primary intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) plus secondary intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) for patients with advanced retinoblastoma.
Retrospective, nonrandomized interventional case series of 14 patients with retinoblastoma managed with primary systemic IVC (vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin for 6 cycles) followed by secondary IAC (melphalan for 1-6 cycles).
Fourteen patients with advanced retinoblastoma classified by the International Classification of Retinoblastoma as Group D (n = 6, 43%) or Group E (n = 8, 57%) were treated with IVC as primary treatment and subsequent secondary IAC as rescue or consolidation therapy. The IAC was given for recurrent retinoblastoma and/or subretinal/vitreous seeds in 13 eyes (93%) and for persistent viable retinoblastoma in 1 eye (7%). Enucleation was the alternative option. The mean interval between IVC completion and IAC start was 40 weeks (median, 11 weeks; range, 2-170 weeks) and the mean number of IAC cycles was 3 (median, 3; range, 1-6). After primary IVC plus secondary IAC, globe salvage was achieved in 8 patients (57%) at mean 2-year follow-up. There was no evidence of retinoblastoma metastasis or death and no sign of second cancer or life-threatening complication.
For advanced retinoblastoma (Groups D and E) in which enucleation is the alternative option, primary systemic IVC followed by secondary focal IAC provides globe salvage in 57% of the eyes and with no metastatic event.
确定晚期视网膜母细胞瘤患者行一线静脉化疗(IVC)加二线动脉内化疗(IAC)的疗效。
回顾性、非随机干预性病例系列研究,纳入 14 例接受一线全身 IVC(长春新碱、依托泊苷和卡铂,共 6 个周期)后行二线 IAC(马法兰,1-6 个周期)治疗的视网膜母细胞瘤患者。
14 例晚期视网膜母细胞瘤患者(国际眼内肿瘤分类标准 D 组 6 例,43%;E 组 8 例,57%)接受 IVC 作为一线治疗,随后二线 IAC 作为挽救或巩固治疗。13 只眼(93%)因复发性视网膜母细胞瘤和/或视网膜下/玻璃体内种子而进行 IAC,1 只眼(7%)因持续性存活的视网膜母细胞瘤而进行 IAC。否则选择眼球摘除术。IVC 完成与 IAC 开始之间的平均间隔为 40 周(中位数,11 周;范围,2-170 周),IAC 周期的平均数量为 3(中位数,3;范围,1-6)。在接受一线 IVC 加二线 IAC 后,8 例患者(57%)在平均 2 年随访时实现眼球保留。无视网膜母细胞瘤转移或死亡证据,也无第二癌症或危及生命的并发症迹象。
对于选择眼球摘除术的晚期视网膜母细胞瘤(D 组和 E 组),一线全身 IVC 加二线局部 IAC 可使 57%的眼实现眼球保留,且无转移事件发生。