• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复测量山间风险评分可提高死亡率的预后预测。

Repeated measurement of the intermountain risk score enhances prognostication for mortality.

机构信息

Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e69160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069160. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069160
PMID:23874899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3714235/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Intermountain Risk Score (IMRS), composed of the complete blood count (CBC) and basic metabolic profile (BMP), predicts mortality and morbidity in medical and general populations. Whether longitudinal repeated measurement of IMRS is useful for prognostication is an important question for its clinical applicability.

METHODS

Females (N = 5,698) and males (N = 5,437) with CBC and BMP panels measured 6 months to 2.0 years apart (mean 1.0 year) had baseline and follow-up IMRS computed. Survival analysis during 4.0±2.5 years (maximum 10 years) evaluated mortality (females: n = 1,255 deaths; males: n = 1,164 deaths) and incident major events (myocardial infarction, heart failure [HF], and stroke).

RESULTS

Both baseline and follow-up IMRS (categorized as high-risk vs. low-risk) were independently associated with mortality (all p<0.001) in bivariable models. For females, follow-up IMRS had hazard ratio (HR) = 5.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.11, 6.64) and baseline IMRS had HR = 3.66 (CI = 2.94, 4.55). Among males, follow-up IMRS had HR = 4.28 (CI = 3.51, 5.22) and baseline IMRS had HR = 2.32 (CI = 1.91, 2.82). IMRS components such as RDW, measured at both time points, also predicted mortality. Baseline and follow-up IMRS strongly predicted incident HF in both genders.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated measurement of IMRS at baseline and at about one year of follow-up were independently prognostic for mortality and incident HF among initially hospitalized patients. RDW and other CBC and BMP values were also predictive of outcomes. Further research should evaluate the utility of IMRS as a tool for clinical risk adjustment.

摘要

背景

由全血细胞计数(CBC)和基本代谢谱(BMP)组成的山间风险评分(IMRS)可预测医疗和一般人群的死亡率和发病率。IMRS 的纵向重复测量是否对预后有用是其临床适用性的一个重要问题。

方法

对 CBC 和 BMP 检测相隔 6 个月至 2.0 年(平均 1.0 年)的女性(N=5698)和男性(N=5437)进行了基线和随访 IMRS 计算。在 4.0±2.5 年(最长 10 年)的生存分析中评估了死亡率(女性:n=1255 例死亡;男性:n=1164 例死亡)和主要事件(心肌梗死、心力衰竭[HF]和中风)的发生率。

结果

在双变量模型中,基线和随访 IMRS(分为高风险与低风险)均与死亡率独立相关(所有 P<0.001)。对于女性,随访 IMRS 的危险比(HR)=5.23(95%置信区间[CI]=4.11,6.64),基线 IMRS 的 HR=3.66(CI=2.94,4.55)。对于男性,随访 IMRS 的 HR=4.28(CI=3.51,5.22),基线 IMRS 的 HR=2.32(CI=1.91,2.82)。IMRS 各成分(如在两个时间点测量的红细胞分布宽度[RDW])也可预测死亡率。基线和随访 IMRS 强烈预测了两性的 HF 事件发生率。

结论

在最初住院的患者中,基线和大约一年随访时的 IMRS 重复测量对死亡率和 HF 发生率有独立的预后作用。RDW 和其他 CBC 和 BMP 值也具有预测作用。进一步的研究应评估 IMRS 作为临床风险调整工具的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/959ad9a8eaf9/pone.0069160.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/46f347de8841/pone.0069160.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/263d73b4325d/pone.0069160.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/959ad9a8eaf9/pone.0069160.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/46f347de8841/pone.0069160.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/263d73b4325d/pone.0069160.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ef/3714235/959ad9a8eaf9/pone.0069160.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Repeated measurement of the intermountain risk score enhances prognostication for mortality.重复测量山间风险评分可提高死亡率的预后预测。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e69160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069160. Print 2013.
2
Practical laboratory-based clinical decision tools and associations with short-term bleeding and mortality outcomes.基于实验室的实用临床决策工具与短期出血和死亡率结局的关联。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Jul;482:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Validation of the Intermountain Risk Score and Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Score in predicting mortality.验证 Intermountain 风险评分和 Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure 评分对死亡率的预测能力。
Open Heart. 2021 Aug;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001722.
4
Improvement in the predictive ability of the Intermountain Mortality Risk Score by adding routinely collected laboratory tests such as albumin, bilirubin, and white cell differential count.通过添加常规收集的实验室检查项目(如白蛋白、胆红素和白细胞分类计数)来提高山间死亡率风险评分的预测能力。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Oct 1;54(10):1619-28. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1258.
5
The intermountain risk score predicts incremental age-specific long-term survival and life expectancy.山间风险评分可预测年龄特异性的长期生存和预期寿命的增量。
Transl Res. 2011 Nov;158(5):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
6
Association of the Intermountain Risk Score with major adverse health events in patients positive for COVID-19: an observational evaluation of a US cohort.美国队列观察性研究:与 COVID-19 阳性患者主要不良健康事件相关的山间风险评分的关联。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 24;12(3):e053864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053864.
7
Comparative evaluation of the clinical laboratory-based Intermountain risk score with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices for mortality prediction.临床实验室为基础的 Intermountain 风险评分与 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 合并症指数对死亡率预测的比较评估。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233495. eCollection 2020.
8
Augmented intelligence decision tool for stroke prediction combines factors from CHA DS -VASc and the intermountain risk score for patients with atrial fibrillation.增强型人工智能决策工具用于预测中风,结合了 CHA2DS2-VASc 和房颤患者的山间风险评分的因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1452-1461. doi: 10.1111/jce.13999. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
9
Novel Stratification of Mortality Risk by Kidney Disease Stage.基于肾病分期的新型死亡风险分层
Am J Nephrol. 2015;42(6):443-50. doi: 10.1159/000443776. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
10
The Intermountain Risk Score predicts mortality in trauma patients.山间风险评分可预测创伤患者的死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):882.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermittent fasting and changes in clinical risk scores: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.间歇性禁食与临床风险评分的变化:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Sep 11;19:200209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200209. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The Summit Score Stratifies Mortality and Morbidity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.峰会评分对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的死亡率和发病率进行分层。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 20;15:1741-1750. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S254437. eCollection 2020.
3
Predicting postdischarge hospital-associated venous thromboembolism among medical patients using a validated mortality risk score derived from common biomarkers.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment.风险预测模型:二、外部验证、模型更新和影响评估。
Heart. 2012 May;98(9):691-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301247. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Why is a good clinical prediction rule so hard to find?为什么很难找到一个好的临床预测规则?
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 24;171(19):1701-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.482.
3
The intermountain risk score predicts incremental age-specific long-term survival and life expectancy.山间风险评分可预测年龄特异性的长期生存和预期寿命的增量。
使用源自常见生物标志物的经过验证的死亡风险评分预测内科患者出院后医院相关静脉血栓栓塞症。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 May 20;4(5):872-878. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12343. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Comparative evaluation of the clinical laboratory-based Intermountain risk score with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices for mortality prediction.临床实验室为基础的 Intermountain 风险评分与 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 合并症指数对死亡率预测的比较评估。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233495. eCollection 2020.
5
Clinically feasible stratification of 1-year to 3-year post-myocardial infarction risk.心肌梗死后1至3年风险的临床可行分层。
Open Heart. 2018 Feb 20;5(1):e000723. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000723. eCollection 2018.
6
Automated identification and predictive tools to help identify high-risk heart failure patients: pilot evaluation.用于帮助识别高危心力衰竭患者的自动识别和预测工具:试点评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):872-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv197. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Transl Res. 2011 Nov;158(5):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
4
The Intermountain Risk Score (including the red cell distribution width) predicts heart failure and other morbidity endpoints.Intermountain 风险评分(包括红细胞分布宽度)可预测心力衰竭和其他发病率终点。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Nov;12(11):1203-13. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq115. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
5
Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study.健康初级保健患者常规使用风险评分的障碍:调查与定性研究
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):719-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66.
6
Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians.评估心血管风险的现有评分的价值与局限性:临床医生综述
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 29;54(14):1209-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.020.
7
Exceptional mortality prediction by risk scores from common laboratory tests.通过常规实验室检查的风险评分进行卓越的死亡率预测。
Am J Med. 2009 Jun;122(6):550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.043.
8
Usefulness of a complete blood count-derived risk score to predict incident mortality in patients with suspected cardiovascular disease.全血细胞计数衍生风险评分对预测疑似心血管疾病患者的死亡风险的有效性。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jan 15;99(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Nov 15.