• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in resource poor settings--a qualitative exploration.资源匮乏环境下医疗信任的维度和决定因素——定性探索。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e69170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069170. Print 2013.
2
Trust in the physician-patient relationship in developing healthcare settings: a quantitative exploration.发展中国家医疗环境中医患关系中的信任:一项定量研究
Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul-Sep;12(3):141-8. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.043.
3
Dimensions of social capital of families with thalassemia in an indigenous population in Tamil Nadu, India - a qualitative study.印度泰米尔纳德邦一个原住民群体中地贫家庭的社会资本维度——一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 24;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0609-8.
4
Factors influencing trust in doctors: a community segmentation strategy for quality improvement in healthcare.影响医患信任的因素:医疗保健质量改进的社区细分策略。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 2;3(12):e004115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004115.
5
Development and validation of a socioculturally competent trust in physician scale for a developing country setting.针对发展中国家环境开发并验证一种具有社会文化适应性的医患信任量表。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 3;5(4):e007305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007305.
6
The patient, the doctor, and the patient's loyalty: a qualitative study in French general practice.患者、医生与患者的忠诚度:一项关于法国全科医疗的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov;66(652):e810-e818. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687541. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Treatment-seeking behaviour in urban Sri Lanka: trusting the state, trusting private providers.斯里兰卡城市地区的就医行为:信任国家,信任私立医疗机构。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1396-407. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.077. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
8
Utilization of maternal health care services and their determinants in Karnataka State, India.印度卡纳塔克邦孕产妇保健服务的利用情况及其决定因素
Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 8;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0138-8.
9
Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: a qualitative exploration.批判种族理论作为理解美国非裔/黑人及西班牙裔艾滋病毒感染者在艾滋病毒护理连续过程中参与度低的一种工具:一项定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 24;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0549-3.
10
What factors shape doctors' trustworthiness? Patients' perspectives in the context of hypertension care in rural Tanzania.哪些因素塑造了医生的可信度?坦桑尼亚农村地区高血压护理背景下的患者观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Aug;20(3):5826. doi: 10.22605/RRH5826. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving Online Healthcare Growth Amid the Digital Divide: How Trust in Professional Signals from Doctor Biographies Shapes Patient Decisions.在数字鸿沟中推动在线医疗保健增长:医生传记中专业信号的信任如何影响患者决策。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1418. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121418.
2
A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities.审视人工智能与医疗保健差距
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Mar 6;8:1545869. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1545869. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing tafenoquine implementation in Brazil: a qualitative evaluation of perceptions of healthcare providers and Plasmodium vivax patients (QualiTRuST Study).评估巴西tafenoquine的实施情况:对医疗服务提供者和间日疟原虫患者认知的定性评估(QualiTRuST研究)
Malar J. 2024 Dec 23;23(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05209-1.
4
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Hostility has a trivial effect on persuasiveness of rebutting science denialism on social media.敌意对在社交媒体上反驳科学否认主义的说服力影响甚微。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;1(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00041-w.
6
Trust Building in Public Health Approaches: The Importance of a "People-Centered" Concept in Crisis Response.公共卫生方法中的信任建立:危机应对中“以人为本”理念的重要性。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug 1;17:1903-1908. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S471250. eCollection 2024.
7
Community engagement for stakeholder and community trust in healthcare: Short-term evaluation findings from a nationwide initiative in Lao PDR.社区参与以建立医疗保健相关利益方和社区的信任:来自老挝全国范围内一项倡议的短期评估结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Aug;354:117079. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117079. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
8
Measuring trust in one's physician: A scoping review.测量对医生的信任:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303840. eCollection 2024.
9
Trust in healthcare: methodological and conceptual insights from mixed-method research in Lao People's Democratic Republic.信任医疗保健:老挝人民民主共和国混合方法研究的方法学和概念见解。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 15;9(5):e014640. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014640.
10
Trust of patients and families in mental healthcare providers and institutions: a cross-cultural study in Chennai, India, and Montreal, Canada.患者和家属对精神卫生保健提供者和机构的信任:在印度钦奈和加拿大蒙特利尔的跨文化研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 May;59(5):813-825. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02576-z. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Good Health at Low Cost 25 years on: lessons for the future of health systems strengthening.低成本实现良好健康 25 年:加强卫生系统的未来经验教训。
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2118-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62000-5. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
2
Medical abortion: understanding perspectives of rural and marginalized women from rural South India.医疗性流产:理解来自印度南部农村的农村和边缘化妇女的观点。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;118 Suppl 1:S33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.008.
3
Power and powerlessness: GPs' narratives about lifestyle counselling.权力与无力感:全科医生关于生活方式咨询的叙述。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Mar;62(596):e160-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X630043.
4
Pharmaceutical industry gifts to physicians: patient beliefs and trust in physicians and the health care system.制药业给医生的礼物:患者对医生和医疗保健系统的信任和信念。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):274-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1760-3. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
5
Trust but verify: the interactive effects of trust and autonomy preferences on health outcomes.信任但要验证:信任和自主权偏好对健康结果的交互影响。
Health Care Anal. 2009 Sep;17(3):244-60. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0100-1. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
6
High medical cost burdens, patient trust, and perceived quality of care.高昂的医疗成本负担、患者信任以及感知到的医疗质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0879-3. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
7
Understanding patient satisfaction, trust, and loyalty to primary care physicians.了解患者对初级保健医生的满意度、信任度和忠诚度。
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Dec;65(6):696-712. doi: 10.1177/1077558708322863. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
Translating primary care practice climate into patient activation: the role of patient trust in physician.将基层医疗实践氛围转化为患者参与度:患者对医生信任的作用。
Med Care. 2008 Aug;46(8):795-805. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817919c0.
9
Literacy and its relationship with self-efficacy, trust, and participation in medical decision making.读写能力及其与自我效能感、信任以及参与医疗决策的关系。
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S27-35. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S27.
10
Health system in India: opportunities and challenges for improvements.印度的卫生系统:改进的机遇与挑战。
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(6):560-72. doi: 10.1108/14777260610702307.

资源匮乏环境下医疗信任的维度和决定因素——定性探索。

Dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in resource poor settings--a qualitative exploration.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial University, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e69170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069170. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069170
PMID:23874904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3712948/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trust in health care has been intensely researched in resource rich settings. Some studies in resource poor settings suggest that the dimensions and determinants of trust are likely to be different.

OBJECTIVES

This study was done as a qualitative exploration of the dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in Tamil Nadu, a state in south India to assess the differences from dimensions and determinants in resource rich settings.

METHODOLOGY

The participants included people belonging to marginalized communities with poor access to health care services and living in conditions of resource deprivation. A total of thirty five in depth interviews were conducted. The interviews were summarized and transcribed and data were analyzed following thematic analysis and grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

The key dimensions of trust in health care identified during the interviews were perceived competence, assurance of treatment irrespective of ability to pay or at any time of the day, patients' willingness to accept drawbacks in health care, loyalty to the physician and respect for the physician. Comfort with the physician and health facility, personal involvement of the doctor with the patient, behavior and approach of doctor, economic factors, and health awareness were identified as factors determining the levels of trust in health care.

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensions and determinants of trust in health care in resource poor settings are different from that in resource rich settings. There is a need to develop scales to measure trust in health care in resource poor settings using these specific dimensions and determinants.

摘要

背景

在资源丰富的环境中,人们对医疗保健的信任进行了深入研究。一些资源匮乏环境中的研究表明,信任的维度和决定因素可能有所不同。

目的

本研究旨在对印度南部泰米尔纳德邦的医疗保健信任的维度和决定因素进行定性探索,以评估其与资源丰富环境中的维度和决定因素的差异。

方法

参与者包括属于边缘化社区的人群,他们获得医疗保健服务的机会有限,生活在资源匮乏的环境中。共进行了 35 次深入访谈。对访谈进行总结和转录,并采用主题分析和扎根理论方法进行数据分析。

结果

访谈中确定的医疗保健信任的关键维度包括感知能力、保证治疗,无论支付能力如何或在一天中的任何时间、患者愿意接受医疗保健中的缺陷、对医生的忠诚和对医生的尊重。对医生和医疗机构的舒适感、医生与患者的个人接触、医生的行为和方法、经济因素和健康意识被确定为决定医疗保健信任水平的因素。

结论

资源匮乏环境中的医疗保健信任的维度和决定因素与资源丰富环境中的不同。需要开发使用这些特定维度和决定因素来衡量资源匮乏环境中医疗保健信任的量表。