Falavigna A, Piccoli Conzatti L
Neurosurgery Department, University of Caxias do Sul Caxias do Sul, Brazil -
J Neurosurg Sci. 2013 Sep;57(3):175-92.
Surgical approaches to the thoracic spine have evolved in recent decades with the development of advanced instrumentation techniques and an increased emphasis on reducing surgical morbidity. Multiple methods to access this area have been described, from a conventional open to a more minimally invasive approach, such as anterior-based, via supra- or transmanubrium, via thoracoscopy, lateral-based approach, extreme lateral mini-thoracotomy, and dorsolateral approaches, transpedicular, costotransversectomy and the lateral extracavitary access. The technique used is often determined by the affected spinal level, pathological process, and surgeon preference. Each of these approaches requires expertise in the specific technique, and has its own complication profile. Over time, these techniques have undergone improvement to limit approach-related morbidity and minimize soft tissue dissection, resulting in better patient outcomes. These different approaches present distinct advantages and disadvantages for which a thorough understanding of the regional anatomy is required to avoid approach-related complications. For these reasons, surgeon experience and confidence in the various techniques are major factors in the decision-making process and patient outcomes.
近几十年来,随着先进器械技术的发展以及对降低手术发病率的日益重视,胸椎手术入路不断演变。已经描述了多种进入该区域的方法,从传统的开放手术到更微创的方法,如以前路为基础,经胸骨上或经胸骨,经胸腔镜,以侧方为基础的方法,极外侧小切口开胸术,以及背外侧入路、经椎弓根、肋横突切除术和外侧腔外入路。所使用的技术通常由受影响的脊柱节段、病理过程和外科医生的偏好决定。这些方法中的每一种都需要特定技术方面的专业知识,并且有其自身的并发症情况。随着时间的推移,这些技术已经得到改进,以限制与手术入路相关的发病率并尽量减少软组织分离,从而改善患者预后。这些不同的手术入路有各自的优缺点,需要对局部解剖有透彻的了解以避免与手术入路相关的并发症。出于这些原因,外科医生在各种技术方面的经验和信心是决策过程和患者预后的主要因素。