Suppr超能文献

牙髓温度测试和电测试的预测价值:一项临床研究。

Predictive values of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: a clinical study.

作者信息

Villa-Chávez Carlos E, Patiño-Marín Nuria, Loyola-Rodríguez Juan P, Zavala-Alonso Norma V, Martínez-Castañón Gabriel A, Medina-Solís Carlo E

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, The Master's Degree in Dental Science with Specialization in Advanced General Dentistry Program, San Luis Potosi University, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.

出版信息

J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):965-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For a diagnostic test to be useful, it is necessary to determine the probability that the test will provide the correct diagnosis. Therefore, it is necessary to calculate the predictive value of diagnostics. The aim of the present study was to identify the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and reproducibility of thermal and electrical tests of pulp sensitivity.

METHODS

The thermal tests studied were the 1, 1, 1, 2-tetrafluoroethane (cold) and hot gutta-percha (hot) tests. For the electrical test, the Analytic Technology Pulp Tester (Analytic Technology, Redmond, WA) was used. A total of 110 teeth were tested: 60 teeth with vital pulp and 50 teeth with necrotic pulps (disease prevalence of 45%). The ideal standard was established by direct pulp inspection.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the diagnostic tests were 0.88 for the cold test, 0.86 for the heat test, and 0.76 for the electrical test, and the specificity was 1.0 for all 3 tests. The negative predictive value was 0.90 for the cold test, 0.89 for the heat test, and 0.83 for the electrical test, and the positive predictive value was 1.0 for all 3 tests. The highest accuracy (0.94) and reproducibility (0.88) were observed for the cold test.

CONCLUSIONS

The cold test was the most accurate method for diagnostic testing.

摘要

引言

为使诊断测试有用,有必要确定该测试能提供正确诊断的概率。因此,有必要计算诊断的预测值。本研究的目的是确定牙髓敏感度热测试和电测试的敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值、准确性及可重复性。

方法

所研究的热测试为1,1,1,2 - 四氟乙烷(冷)测试和热牙胶(热)测试。电测试使用Analytic Technology牙髓测试仪(Analytic Technology,华盛顿州雷德蒙德)。总共对110颗牙齿进行了测试:60颗牙髓活力正常的牙齿和50颗牙髓坏死的牙齿(疾病患病率为45%)。通过直接牙髓检查确立理想标准。

结果

诊断测试的敏感度分别为冷测试0.88、热测试0.86、电测试0.76,所有3项测试的特异度均为1.0。冷测试的阴性预测值为0.90,热测试为0.89,电测试为0.83,所有3项测试的阳性预测值均为1.0。冷测试的准确性最高(0.94),可重复性最强(0.88)。

结论

冷测试是诊断测试中最准确的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验