Almutairi Waleed, Aminoshariae Anita, Williams Kristin, Mickel Andre
Department of Endodontics, Qassim University, College of Dentistry, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr 22;6(2):151-4. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.94840.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of electric pulp testing (EPT) using the bridging technique in comparison to a cold test on crowned teeth.
Thirty teeth were included in this study. Only one crowned tooth from each subject was included. The adjacent teeth served as controls. The crowned teeth were tested for pulp vitality using a bridging EPT technique and cold test. Vitality was confirmed upon access based on bleeding or lack of bleeding from detected root canal systems. The data was statistically analyzed using the McNamara test (P<0.05).
The sensitivities of the cold test and bridging EPT were 87% and 66% respectively. Accuracy for cold and bridging EPT were 87% and 67% respectively. The cold test demonstrated a statistically significant higher accuracy and sensitivity than the bridging EPT. However, no significant difference was detected in the specificity between the two tests.
Both EPT and cold test should be considered as an adjunctive diagnostic tool when determining pulp status in a crowned tooth. Pulp sensitivity tests are essential but the results should be interpreted in combination with other clinical signs/symptoms.
本研究旨在评估采用桥接技术的电活力测试(EPT)相较于冠修复牙冷诊的敏感性和特异性。
本研究纳入30颗牙齿。每位受试者仅纳入一颗冠修复牙,相邻牙齿作为对照。采用桥接EPT技术和冷诊对冠修复牙进行牙髓活力测试。根据开髓时检测到的根管系统有无出血来确认牙髓活力。采用麦克纳马拉检验对数据进行统计学分析(P<0.05)。
冷诊和桥接EPT的敏感性分别为87%和66%。冷诊和桥接EPT的准确性分别为87%和67%。冷诊的准确性和敏感性在统计学上显著高于桥接EPT。然而,两种测试在特异性方面未检测到显著差异。
在确定冠修复牙的牙髓状态时,EPT和冷诊均应被视为辅助诊断工具。牙髓敏感性测试至关重要,但结果应结合其他临床体征/症状进行解读。