Suppr超能文献

["创伤超声重点评估扩展版(e-FAST)实践对急诊科临床决策的影响"]

[Impact of the practice of "Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma" (e-FAST) on clinical decision in the emergency department].

作者信息

Uz Ilhan, Yürüktümen Aslıhan, Boydak Bahar, Bayraktaroğlu Selen, Ozçete Enver, Cevrim Ozgür, Ersel Murat, Kıyan Selahattin

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jul;19(4):327-32. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.23326.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to show the sensitivity of Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (e-FAST) for detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax and intraabdominal injury. We also investigated the relationship between e-FAST and need for invasive treatment.

METHODS

This study included patients who experienced multiple trauma. The emergency physician, who had no clinical information about the patient, performed e-FAST. Findings on a supine chest X-ray and invasive interventions were recorded. The results of abdomen and thorax computed tomography (CT) were reviewed (the size of the pneumothorax was scored).

RESULTS

Compared with CT, the sensitivities of e-FAST for intraabdominal injury and hemothorax were 54.5% and 71%, respectively. The patients with hemothorax and intraabdominal injuries were not identified with e-FAST, didn't need for invasive intervention. Pneumothorax diagnosis was established in 27 patients with e-FAST (sensitivity 81.8%) from among 33 (30.8%) pneumothorax patients. According to the grading on CT, pneumothoraces less than 1 cm in width and not exceeding the midcoronal line in length were not identified. e-FAST was positive for all patients performed with tube thoracostomy.

CONCLUSION

e-FAST can be used with high sensitivity for determination of pneumothorax requiring invasive procedure. It has low sensitivity in the diagnosis of intraabdominal injury and hemothorax; however, e-FAST can predict the need for invasive procedures.

摘要

背景

我们旨在展示创伤超声扩展聚焦评估(e-FAST)对气胸、血胸和腹腔内损伤检测的敏感性。我们还研究了e-FAST与侵入性治疗需求之间的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了多发伤患者。对患者情况一无所知的急诊医生进行e-FAST检查。记录仰卧位胸部X线检查结果和侵入性干预措施。回顾腹部和胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果(对气胸大小进行评分)。

结果

与CT相比,e-FAST对腹腔内损伤和血胸的敏感性分别为54.5%和71%。e-FAST未识别出血胸和腹腔内损伤患者,这些患者也不需要侵入性干预。33例(占30.8%)气胸患者中,27例通过e-FAST确诊气胸(敏感性81.8%)。根据CT分级,宽度小于1 cm且长度未超过冠状中线的气胸未被识别。所有接受胸腔闭式引流术的患者e-FAST检查均为阳性。

结论

e-FAST可用于高敏感性地确定需要侵入性治疗的气胸。它在诊断腹腔内损伤和血胸方面敏感性较低;然而,e-FAST可以预测侵入性治疗的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验