Ianniello Stefania, Di Giacomo Vincenza, Sessa Barbara, Miele Vittorio
Department of Emergency Radiology and Cardioscience, S. Camillo Hospital, Via Portuense 332, 00100, Rome, Italy,
Radiol Med. 2014 Sep;119(9):674-80. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0384-1. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Combined clinical examination and supine chest radiography have shown low accuracy in the assessment of pneumothorax in unstable patients with major chest trauma during the primary survey in the emergency room. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of extended-focused assessment with sonography in trauma (e-FAST), in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, compared with the results of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and of invasive interventions (thoracostomy tube placement).
This was a retrospective case series involving 368 consecutive unstable adult patients (273 men and 95 women; average age, 25 years; range, 16-68 years) admitted to our hospital's emergency department between January 2011 and December 2012 for major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 15). We evaluated the accuracy of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax compared with the results of MDCT and invasive interventions (thoracostomy tube placement). Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to commencement of this study.
Among the 736 lung fields included in the study, 87 pneumothoraces were detected with thoracic CT scans (23.6%). e-FAST detected 67/87 and missed 20 pneumothoraces (17 mild, 3 moderate). The diagnostic performance of ultrasound was: sensitivity 77% (74% in 2011 and 80% in 2012), specificity 99.8%, positive predictive value 98.5%, negative predictive value 97%, accuracy 97.2% (67 true positive; 668 true negative; 1 false positive; 20 false negative); 17 missed mild pneumothoraces were not immediately life-threatening (thickness less than 5 mm).
Thoracic ultrasound (e-FAST) is a rapid and accurate first-line, bedside diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in unstable patients with major chest trauma during the primary survey in the emergency room.
在急诊室对胸部严重创伤的不稳定患者进行初次检查时,联合临床检查和仰卧位胸部X线摄影对气胸的评估准确性较低。我们研究的目的是评估创伤超声扩展聚焦评估(e-FAST)在气胸诊断中的诊断准确性,并与多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和侵入性干预(胸腔造瘘管置入)的结果进行比较。
这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,纳入了2011年1月至2012年12月期间因严重创伤(损伤严重度评分≥15)入住我院急诊科的368例连续的不稳定成年患者(273例男性和95例女性;平均年龄25岁;范围16 - 68岁)。我们将胸部超声检测气胸的准确性与MDCT和侵入性干预(胸腔造瘘管置入) 的结果进行了比较。在本研究开始前获得了机构审查委员会的批准。
在纳入研究的736个肺野中,胸部CT扫描检测到87例气胸(23.6%)。e-FAST检测到67/87例,漏诊20例气胸(17例轻度,3例中度)。超声的诊断性能为:敏感性77%(2011年为74%,2012年为80%),特异性99.8%,阳性预测值98.5%,阴性预测值97%,准确性97.2%(67例真阳性;668例真阴性;1例假阳性;20例假阴性);17例漏诊的轻度气胸不会立即危及生命(厚度小于5mm)。
胸部超声(e-FAST)是急诊室对胸部严重创伤的不稳定患者进行初次检查时诊断气胸的一种快速、准确的一线床旁诊断方法。