Kunst A E, Looman C W, Mackenbach J P
Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(2):141-52. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90055-w.
The finding that mortality differences between occupational classes in England and Wales have widened during the postwar period raises the question whether a similar development has occurred in other industrialised countries. In this paper, a comparison is made with results from a geographical study on the Netherlands. This study compares four periods between 1950 and 1984 by means of a standard regional division, a single socio-economic index, uniform cause-of-death groups and a standard regression procedure. During the postwar period, the relationship between socio-economic level and all-cause mortality has become (more) negative. This development can to a large extent be attributed to 'negative' trends for lung cancer, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and traffic accidents. High-level regions have fared better partly because favourable changes in national mortality trends seem to have begun first in these regions. The findings from this regional study agree to a large extent with evidence from Dutch studies at the individual level. It is concluded that socio-economic mortality differences in England and Wales and the Netherlands have probably developed similarly in various respects.
英格兰和威尔士职业阶层之间的死亡率差异在战后有所扩大,这一发现引发了一个问题:其他工业化国家是否也出现了类似的情况。在本文中,将与荷兰一项地理研究的结果进行比较。该研究通过标准区域划分、单一社会经济指数、统一死因分组和标准回归程序,对1950年至1984年的四个时期进行了比较。战后时期,社会经济水平与全因死亡率之间的关系变得(更加)负相关。这一发展在很大程度上可归因于肺癌、糖尿病、缺血性心脏病、脑血管疾病和交通事故的“负面”趋势。高收入地区情况较好,部分原因是全国死亡率趋势的有利变化似乎首先在这些地区开始。这项区域研究的结果在很大程度上与荷兰个体层面研究的证据一致。结论是,英格兰、威尔士和荷兰的社会经济死亡率差异在各方面可能发展得相似。