Suppr超能文献

风险调整模型用于不良产科结局以及医院间风险调整结局的差异。

Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University-MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):446.e1-446.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Regulatory bodies and insurers evaluate hospital quality using obstetrical outcomes, however meaningful comparisons should take preexisting patient characteristics into account. Furthermore, if risk-adjusted outcomes are consistent within a hospital, fewer measures and resources would be needed to assess obstetrical quality. Our objective was to establish risk-adjusted models for 5 obstetric outcomes and assess hospital performance across these outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied a cohort of 115,502 women and their neonates born in 25 hospitals in the United States from March 2008 through February 2011. Hospitals were ranked according to their unadjusted and risk-adjusted frequency of venous thromboembolism, postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, severe perineal laceration, and a composite neonatal adverse outcome. Correlations between hospital risk-adjusted outcome frequencies were assessed.

RESULTS

Venous thromboembolism occurred too infrequently (0.03%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.04%) for meaningful assessment. Other outcomes occurred frequently enough for assessment (postpartum hemorrhage, 2.29%; 95% CI, 2.20-2.38, peripartum infection, 5.06%; 95% CI, 4.93-5.19, severe perineal laceration at spontaneous vaginal delivery, 2.16%; 95% CI, 2.06-2.27, neonatal composite, 2.73%; 95% CI, 2.63-2.84). Although there was high concordance between unadjusted and adjusted hospital rankings, several individual hospitals had an adjusted rank that was substantially different (as much as 12 rank tiers) than their unadjusted rank. None of the correlations between hospital-adjusted outcome frequencies was significant. For example, the hospital with the lowest adjusted frequency of peripartum infection had the highest adjusted frequency of severe perineal laceration.

CONCLUSION

Evaluations based on a single risk-adjusted outcome cannot be generalized to overall hospital obstetric performance.

摘要

目的

监管机构和保险公司使用产科结果来评估医院质量,但有意义的比较应该考虑到现有患者的特征。此外,如果医院内的风险调整后结果一致,则需要更少的措施和资源来评估产科质量。我们的目标是建立 5 种产科结果的风险调整模型,并评估这些结果的医院绩效。

研究设计

我们研究了 2008 年 3 月至 2011 年 2 月期间美国 25 家医院的 115502 名妇女及其新生儿的队列。根据静脉血栓栓塞、产后出血、围产期感染、严重会阴裂伤和新生儿不良复合结局的未调整和风险调整频率对医院进行排名。评估了医院风险调整后结局频率之间的相关性。

结果

静脉血栓栓塞发生的频率太低(0.03%;95%置信区间[CI],0.02-0.04%),无法进行有意义的评估。其他结局发生的频率足以进行评估(产后出血,2.29%;95%CI,2.20-2.38%,围产期感染,5.06%;95%CI,4.93-5.19%,自然分娩时严重会阴裂伤,2.16%;95%CI,2.06-2.27%,新生儿复合结局,2.73%;95%CI,2.63-2.84%)。尽管未调整和调整后的医院排名之间具有高度一致性,但个别医院的调整后排名与未调整排名有很大差异(高达 12 个排名等级)。医院调整后结局频率之间没有显著相关性。例如,围产期感染调整后频率最低的医院严重会阴裂伤的调整后频率最高。

结论

基于单一风险调整结局的评估不能推广到医院整体产科绩效。

相似文献

1
Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):446.e1-446.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
2
Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;211(2):147.e1-147.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):638.e1-638.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and obstetric care.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;125(6):1460-1467. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000735.
6
Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):521-529. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001000.
7
Association between peripartum hysterectomy and venous thromboembolism.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):119.e1-119.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.091. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
8
[Maternal effects of prolonged expulsive efforts].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Feb;45(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in U.S. hospitals.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):521-527. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822a65e4.

引用本文的文献

2
Outcomes of induction vs prelabor cesarean delivery at <33 weeks for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101032. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101032. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Patient healthcare experiences of cancer hospitals in China: A multilevel modeling analysis based on a national survey.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:1059878. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1059878. eCollection 2023.
4
Short-term neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Apr;5(4):100874. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100874. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
5
Association of Maternal Body Mass Index and Maternal Morbidity And Mortality.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e204-e211. doi: 10.1055/a-1877-8918. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
8
An evaluation of seasonal maternal-neonatal morbidity related to trainee cycles.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 May;4(3):100583. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100583. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
10
Perinatal morbidity and health utilization among mothers of medically fragile infants.
J Perinatol. 2022 Feb;42(2):169-176. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01171-x. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):67-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.5525. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
3
Clinical audit: a useful tool for reducing severe postpartum haemorrhages?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):583-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr042. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
4
Comparing postcesarean infectious complication rates using two different skin preparations.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1123-1129. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182118e98.
5
Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):627-635. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2.
6
Quality improvement demands quality measurement.
BJOG. 2010 Dec;117(13):1571-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02734.x.
7
STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):875-81; discussion 881-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.115.
8
Accountability measures--using measurement to promote quality improvement.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):683-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1002320. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
9
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
10
Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):111-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803267.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验